(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 17147)
Florence Police Department Investigated (Case No. F20XX-XXXXX7)
State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 17837)
Bullhead City Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXO), and Department of Child Safety Investigated (DCS No. IN-XXXXXX6)
State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 17831)
Chandler Police Department Investigated
State v. Mr. O (DMC No. 17835)
Mesa Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX9)
State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 17598)
Pinal County Sheriff’s Office Investigated (DR No. 2XXXXXXX1), Department of Child Safety Investigated (IR No. 1XXXXX8), and Apache Junction Police Department Investigated (IR No. 2XXXXXX6)
State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 17597)
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Investigated (IR No. 20XX-XXX9) and Arizona Department of Child Safety Investigated
State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 17596)
Tempe Police Department Investigated(DR No. TE20XX-XXXX1) and Department of Child Safety Investigated (Intake No. IN01XXXXXO)
State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 17561)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX1), Bakersfield, California Police Department Investigated; and Arizona Department of Child Safety Investigated (DCS No. 6XXXX6)
State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 16550)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated, and Private Law Firm Investigated (CV 20XX-XXXXX2)
State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 16596)
Tucson Police Department Investigated (TPD No. 20XX-XXXXXXX3)
State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 17856)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX4)
State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 18299)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXXX3) and DCS Investigated (DCS No. 1XXXXX7)
State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 17886)
Glendale Police Department Investigated (DR No. IXXXXXXX4)
State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 18292)
MARICOPA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX5)
State v. Mr. D (DMC No. 15547)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX8)
State v. Ms. K (DMC No. 15559)
Gilbert Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX8)
State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 16316)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX0), and New Mexico Department of Public Safety Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX3)
State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 17559)
St. John’s Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXX9), and Pinetop/Lakeside Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX6)
State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 17489)
Pinal County Sheriff’s Office Investigated (DR No. 1XXXXXXX0)
State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 17474)
Mesa PD Investigated (Case No. DR20XX-XXXXXX9)
State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 17473)
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office Jurisdiction (Case Resolved Directly with Alleged Victim’s Parents)
State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 17491)
Gilbert Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX6) and Department of Child Safety (DR No. 2XXXX5)
State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 15827)
Casa Grande PD Investigated (DR No. 0X-XXXXXXX5)
State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 16181)
Mesa Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXX1)
State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 17851)
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Investigated (IR No. 2XXXXXX3)
State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 13858)
Tucson Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX7)
State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 15561)
Gilbert Police Department investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX8)
State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 15596)
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, AND Glendale Police Department investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX1)
State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 13220)
Peoria Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXX7)
State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 13978)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXXXX6)
Pinal County Sheriff’s Office investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX8)
Cochise County Attorney’s Office, Sierra Vista Police Department Investigated (DR #20XX-XXXX5)
State v. Mr. F (DMC No. 12064)
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (DR No. 20XX-XXXXX5), AND Maricopa County Attorney’s Office
State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 13187)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX7)
State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 12879)
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXX0)
State v. Mr. D (DMC No. 15191)
Glendale Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXX8)
State.v. Mr. F (DMC No. 16280)
Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX9)
State v. Ms. G (DMC No. 16281)
Gilbert Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX1)
State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 16279)
Phoenix Police Department investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXXXX8)
State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 16273)
Mesa Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXX0)
State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 11378)
Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXX0)
State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 12717)
Surprise Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXX9), AND Maricopa County Attorney’s Office INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 10230)
CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE ( CASE NO. CR2009-01500)
State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 13250)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2012-XXXXXXXX)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. D (DMC No. 14029)
CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXXXX)
State v. Mr. V (DMC No. 14930)
COCONINO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE (CASE NO. SRS15-00835)
GILBERT POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
CPS INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 8009)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 13467)
GILBERT POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXXXXXXX)
State v. Mr. D (DMC No. 14157)
GILBERT POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2014-XXXXXXXX)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT/CPS INVESTIGATED
PINAL COUNTY SHERRIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED
SURPRISE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CPS INVESTIGATED
PRESCOTT VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 10166)
GLOBE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
SURPRISE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
PHOENIX PD INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 10209)
PHOENIX PD INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. & Mrs. W (DMC No. 10211 & 10212)
PHOENIX PD INVESTIGATED
GLENDALE PD INVESTIGATED
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 11815)
TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 12467)
MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2009-XXXXXX) (DMC NO. 9296)
PRESCOTT POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 11585)
MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 11549)
GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 12146)
State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 15105)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXXX3)
State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 14255)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXXX9), AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 14357)
FLAGSTAFF POLICE DEPARTMENT INITIALLY INVESTIGATED, THEN COCONINO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE (DR NO. SXXX-XXXXXX9); COCONINO COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
State v. Mr. Y. (DMC No. 14759)
GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXXX4), AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
State v. Mr. K (DMC No. 11257)
Glendale Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX5)
State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 12542)
Craigslist and Wickenburg Police Department Contacted
State v. Mr. L (DMC No. 16289)
Avondale Police Department (DR No. 20XX–XXXX6), AND Maricopa County Attorney’s Office INVESTIGATED
State.v. Mr. H (DMC No. 16286)
Paradise Valley Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX6)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 14012)
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXXXX)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
BUCKEYE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
APACHE JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. O (DMC No. 13977)
GOODYEAR POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2015-XXXXX)
(PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT AND PHOENIX UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIALS INVESTIGATED)
State v. Mr. L (DMC No. 14929)
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE (CASE NO. DR2015-XXXXXX)
MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 14002)
CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXX)
State vs. Mr. T (DMC No. 9769)
GILBERT POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Ms. L (DMC No. 13915)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXXXXXX
State v. Mr. L (DMC No. 12516)
TACOMA, WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
YAVAPAI COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERRIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED
(MARICOPA COUNTY SHERRIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED)
SURPRISE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, AND SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 11816)
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
YOUNGTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. & Mrs. S (DMC No. 5827 & 5828)
EL MIRAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 10434)
CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (CASE NO. CR 2006-XXXXXX)
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED
NVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (CASE NO CR2003-XXXXXX)
State v. Mr. C (Case No.)(DMC No.)
INVESTIGATED
INVESTIGATED
MARICOPA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT (DMC NO. 7372)
SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 12362)
State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 14507)
CASA GRANDE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED
State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 14774)
PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX3), AND PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED
EXCELLENT Based on 391 reviews Posted on matt harrellTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Jason Karpel at DM assigned his team of David Campbell and Leah Dodd, which did an amazing job, being very attentive and making themselves available anytime we needed a conversation. This team worked out everything I needed and highly recommend this firm for anything !!! Thank you DM Cantor Team !Posted on Paul ZellnerTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great lawyers!!!Posted on SebTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. The legal team at DM Cantor is absolutely phenomenal. They helped me win my case and made me feel at home throughout the whole process. I am extremely grateful I chose DM Cantor for legal help, and I cannot recommend them enough!Posted on Adam FloodTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Fantastic office, clean, and amazing artwork. Plus final boss sour!Posted on Kevin McDermottTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I worked with Nick Boca and Robyn McCraw. I felt I was in the best of hands from the beginning. They were clear and upfront at all times with their communication and instruction. Any divorce is a difficult time, and Nick and Robyn understand that. Their compassion for my situation and professionalism in how they handled my case stood out the most. I would highly recommend their services to anyone going through a difficult divorce. KMPosted on PeggyTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Cantor Law Group came as a recommendation from a family friend, and I am so grateful that this led me to speak with Nicholas Boca. Nik represented me in a complicated divorce which detailed a substantial claim of waste that spanned my 25-year marriage. He was very straightforward and honest and worked purposefully on my behalf at all times. He was empathetic to my situation and found ways to navigate difficult challenges unique to my case. Perhaps most importantly, he understood the importance of bringing closure to my situation and did his best to avoid unnecessary legal expenses. His methods to find resolution required wisdom and experienced practice of law. My heartfelt gratitude also extends to Robyn and Amanda. This was a team effort. Amanda’s knowledge of law, Robyn’s organizational skills and instinctive nature were invaluable. My “team” at Cantor Law Group cared. My case mattered, I mattered, my family mattered. From the front desk to the billing department, everyone handled my inquiries and needs without delay. Each person I interacted with seemed to know me personally and I felt reassured they were all working together to achieve the best possible outcome. Cantor Law Group has an excellent reputation amongst the experts. It was extremely reassuring knowing that the work ethic and professionalism of Cantor Law Group is respected by both the experts and the court. I would HIGHLY recommend Cantor Law group.Posted on Ayoub AbouriTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Met with Jason for a consultation. He was very honest and upfront. I appreciate the advice and information. I’m very happy I came in and even though I did not hire them I highly recommend them.Posted on Mike LaForestTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. All the attorneys are exceptional and they all work collaboratively on your case. While I worked closely with David, the other attorney's where always up to date and provided unparalleled guidance. Bottom line, they are a cut above and they deliver. You get what you pay for. If it matters, talk to DM Cantor.
Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.