(602) 307-0808

Call Now, Open 24/7

Excellent Google Reviews, Best Criminal Defense Lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona

State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 17837)

Table of Contents

State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 17837)

State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 17837) – Felony Luring a Minor for Sexual Exploitation (11-year-old Minor/40-year-old Adult), Felony Child Molestation (Dangerous Crimes Against Children), and Felony Public Sexual Indecency – Not Charged – Bullhead City Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXO), and Department of Child Safety Investigated (DCS No. IN-XXXXXX6)

Mr. G had been the primary parent of the alleged Victim since she was 11 years old, and the biological mother was incarcerated in Prison. As she progressed her way through her teenage years and turned 17, she became more and more rebellious. Mr. G was a strict parent, who would not allow her to go to Las Vegas or to other local river casinos near Kingman with her friends. Ultimately, he did not allow the alleged Victim to remain home while the rest of the family traveled to California. A large argument ensued, and she stormed out of the house. One day later, a Police Officer arrived with Temporary Protective Orders and served Mr. G. It was at this time he secured the services of DM Cantor.

In those Orders, it was determined they were filed by the alleged Victim’s best friend’s mother. There were claims that for the past six years Mr. G had been threatening the girl’s safety, exhibiting violence and threats with knives or other weapons, had been choking her,  and videotaped her naked in her room while she was showering. There’s also allegations that he would masturbate in front of her over the course of the previous six years. 

We immediately contacted the Bullhead City Detective who was involved, and provided them with an entire background of the alleged victim and her behavior. We also provided a polygraph test, which Mr. G had “passed”. We also Invoked Mr. G’s Right to Remain Silent. However, we did offer a sit-down conversation with the Detective. Lastly, we included all of this information in a “Trebus/Bashir” Letter. 

After the Detectives reviewed the entire case, ultimately a decision was made Not to Charge Mr. G. In addition, the Department of Child Safety investigation had “Unsubstantiated” the claims by the girl. Although the girl eventually turned 18, and moved out on her own to live with her friend, Mr. G was Never Charged with the crimes that she alleged. If he had been Charged and Convicted of all the crimes, he could have spent the Rest of his Life in Prison. Instead, he has no Criminal Record.

DM Cantor, Best Criminal Defense Lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona
Free Initial Consultation
Open 24/7
Free Initial Consultation

Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success

Call Now Button