Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories

Ranking Arizona Logo
Super Lawyers Logo
Avvo Logo

Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories

Not Charged/”Case Inactivated” (and “Unsubstantiated” by the Department of Child Safety) | Felony Sexual Assault (Dangerous Crimes Against Children) 30-Year-Old Adult/14-Year-Old Minor, and Felony Sexual Abuse (DCAC)

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 15586)

Gilbert Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX6) and DCS (Case No. 5XXXX3)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by Maricopa County Attorney’s Office | Felony Sexual Assault (“MeToo” Allegation) 17-Year-Old/16-Year-Old

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 18296)

GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (IR NO. PI XXXXX7)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by the Pinal County Attorney’s Office | (4 Counts) Felony Sexual Assault, and (1 Count) Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor (21-Year-Old Adult/17-Year-Old Minor)

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 18292)

MARICOPA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX5)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office Juvenile Division | Juvenile Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 17088)

Surprise Police Department Investigated (IR No. 20XX-XXXXXX1) and Maricopa County Juvenile Court (Case No. 20XX-XXXXXX5)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 17389)

Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX9)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office | (2 Counts) Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 16931)

Glendale Police Department Investigated (FI No. 20XX-XXXXX7), and Maricopa County Superior Court (Case No. PF20XX-XXXXX5)

Not Charged (and Title 9 Claim “Unsubstantiated”) | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 16044)

Tempe Police Department Investigated (TE No. 20XX-XXXX2), and Scottsdale Community College Title 9 Office Investigated

Not Charged (and Title 9 Violation Dismissed) | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. J (DMC No. 17576)

Flagstaff Police Department Investigated (DR No. P20XX-XXXX6) and NAU Equity and Access Investigated (Case No. 1XXX-XXXX9)

Not Charged | Felony Kidnapping, (2 Counts) Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Burglary

State v. Mr. N (DMC No. 17840)

Chandler Police Department Investigated (DR No. CH20XX-XXXXX5)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Ms. W (DMC No. 17849)

Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX7)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by the Yavapai County Attorney’s Office (and Title 9 Claim “Unfounded” by Embry Riddle University) | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. J (DMC No. 17206)

Prescott Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXX8-XXX) and Embry Riddle Office of Student Affairs

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Sexual Abuse

State v. Mr. D (DMC No. 17200)

Buckeye Police Department Investigated (IR No. 20XX-XXXXXX2)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Surreptitious Recording

State v. Mr. N (DMC No. 14216)

PIMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX4); TOHONO O’ODHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX4); PIMA COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TURNED DOWN PROSECUTION

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. L (DMC No. 16725A)

Mesa Police Department Investigated (ME No. 20XX-XXXX0)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by the Yavapai County Attorney’s Office | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 17060)

Prescott Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX-XX1)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 17062)

Scottsdale Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX1)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Dr. G (DMC No. 16055)

Buckeye Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXX7)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (and Title 9 Claim “Unsubstantiated” at Hearing) | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 15511, and 14373)

ASU Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX3), and University of Arizona Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 16785)

Mesa Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXX0)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 11566)

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR15-04050)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Sexual Abuse (While on Felony Probation)

State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 16857)

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Investigated (IR No. 20XX-XXXXX1)

Not Charged (and Massage Board Claim “Unsubstantiated” at Review Hearing) | Felony Sexual Assault (“Me Too” Allegation)

State v. Mr. F (DMC No. 16826)

Chandler Police Department Investigated (CH No. 20XX-XXXX8) and Arizona Massage Board (Case No. 20XX-XX-XX-NOA)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” by Pinal County Attorney’s Office Juvenile Division | Juvenile Felony Sexual Assault/“Me Too” Allegation (Dangerous Crimes Against Children) 17-Year-Old/16-Year-Old, and Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor (DCAC)

State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 15827)

Casa Grande PD Investigated (DR No. 0X-XXXXXXX5)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (Dangerous Crimes Against Children) 72-Year Old adult/11-Year-Old minor, Felony Sexual Abuse, Felony Vulnerable Adult Abuse, and Felony Burglary

State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 15609)

Pinal County Sheriff’s Office investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX8)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (Dangerous Crimes Against Children), Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor (DCAC), and Felony Child Molestation (DCAC) Involving 3 Alleged Victims

State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 6867)

MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault (47-Year-Old Adult/15-Year-Old Minor), and Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 15596)

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office “Turned Down,” Glendale Police Department investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX1)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 16287)

Paradise Valley Police Department investigated (DR No. 20XX–XXXXXXX3)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 16288)

Scottsdale Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX–XXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 16282)

Gila County Sheriff’s office investigated (DR No.20XX–XXXXXX5) & Gila County Attorney’s Office “Turned Down Charges”

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State.v. Mr. A. (DMC No. 16277)

Flagstaff Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX3)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 14225)

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. CH20XX-XXXXXXX0)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. Y (DMC No. 12848)

Scottsdale Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXX6)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. Z (DMC No. 12960)

Gilbert Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXX6)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 14057)

Mesa Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXX1)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 13197)

Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX1)

Not Charged (and Nursing License Preserved) | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. K (DMC No. 12674)

Chandler Police Department Investigated (DR No. X1-X1-XXX4)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 11447)

Peoria Police Department Investigated (DR No. 0X-0X-XXXXX0) & Maricopa County Attorney’s Office “Turned Down Prosecution”

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 15354)

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (SEARCH WARRANT NO. 20XX-XXXX6)

Not Charged | Felony Burglary, and Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 14931)

PEORIA POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2015-XXXXXXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 13875)

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXXXXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. E (DMC No. 13760)

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXXXXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Surreptitious Recording | State v. Mr. T

State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 14041)

TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2014-13XXXX)

Not Charged | Sexual Exploitation of a Minor / Child Pornography (Dangerous Crimes Against Children), and Child Molestation

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 13250)

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2012-XXXXXXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 5222)

(PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT AND PHOENIX UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIALS INVESTIGATED)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Sexual Abuse

State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 4465)

TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Child Molestation

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 14002)

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-XXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 14200)

GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2014-XXXXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. Z (DMC No. 14391)

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2014-XXXXX)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 8047)

MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 8248)

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 9701)

PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 6715)

TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 5979)

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. J (DMC No. 857)

MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Vulnerable Adult Abuse

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 6764)

GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Vulnerable Adult Abuse

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 6772)

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault | State vs. Mr. N

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 11552)

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. W and Mr. H (DMC No. 471)

INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 1481)

INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. O (DMC No. 1597)

INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. D (DMC No. 3041)

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT. INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 3704)

TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State vs. Mr. R (DMC No. 10012)

TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 6881)

PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED

Not Charged/Title 9 Claim “Not Responsible” | Sexual Misconduct/Sexual Assault

State v Mr. C (DMC No. 13800)

ASU STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OFFICE INVESTIGATED – TITLE 9/SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY HEARING

Not Charged/Title 9 Claim “Unsubstantiated” | Sexual Assault

Scottsdale Community College v Mr. T (DMC No. 14070)

(SCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEAN OF STUDENTS INVESTIGATED – TITLE 9/SCHOOL DISCIPLINE HEARING)

Not Charged/Student Not Expelled at Title 9 / School Disciplinary Hearing | Sexual Assault, and Endangerment

ASU v Mr. M (DMC No. 13778)

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OFFICE INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault, and Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 14774)

PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX3); PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE “TURNED DOWN.”

DM Cantor, Best Criminal Defense Lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona
Posted on Google Google
matt harrell profile picture
matt harrell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Jason Karpel at DM assigned his team of David Campbell and Leah Dodd, which did an amazing job, being very attentive and making themselves available anytime we needed a conversation. This team worked out everything I needed and highly recommend this firm for anything !!! Thank you DM Cantor Team !
Posted on Google Google
Paul Zellner profile picture
Paul Zellner
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great lawyers!!!
Posted on Google Google
Seb profile picture
Seb
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The legal team at DM Cantor is absolutely phenomenal. They helped me win my case and made me feel at home throughout the whole process. I am extremely grateful I chose DM Cantor for legal help, and I cannot recommend them enough!
Posted on Google Google
Adam Flood profile picture
Adam Flood
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Fantastic office, clean, and amazing artwork. Plus final boss sour!
Posted on Google Google
Kevin McDermott profile picture
Kevin McDermott
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I worked with Nick Boca and Robyn McCraw. I felt I was in the best of hands from the beginning. They were clear and upfront at all times with their communication and instruction. Any divorce is a difficult time, and Nick and Robyn understand that. Their compassion for my situation and professionalism in how they handled my case stood out the most. I would highly recommend their services to anyone going through a difficult divorce. KM
Posted on Google Google
Peggy profile picture
Peggy
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Cantor Law Group came as a recommendation from a family friend, and I am so grateful that this led me to speak with Nicholas Boca. Nik represented me in a complicated divorce which detailed a substantial claim of waste that spanned my 25-year marriage. He was very straightforward and honest and worked purposefully on my behalf at all times. He was empathetic to my situation and found ways to navigate difficult challenges unique to my case. Perhaps most importantly, he understood the importance of bringing closure to my situation and did his best to avoid unnecessary legal expenses. His methods to find resolution required wisdom and experienced practice of law. My heartfelt gratitude also extends to Robyn and Amanda. This was a team effort. Amanda’s knowledge of law, Robyn’s organizational skills and instinctive nature were invaluable. My “team” at Cantor Law Group cared. My case mattered, I mattered, my family mattered. From the front desk to the billing department, everyone handled my inquiries and needs without delay. Each person I interacted with seemed to know me personally and I felt reassured they were all working together to achieve the best possible outcome. Cantor Law Group has an excellent reputation amongst the experts. It was extremely reassuring knowing that the work ethic and professionalism of Cantor Law Group is respected by both the experts and the court. I would HIGHLY recommend Cantor Law group.
Posted on Google Google
Ayoub Abouri profile picture
Ayoub Abouri
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Met with Jason for a consultation. He was very honest and upfront. I appreciate the advice and information. I’m very happy I came in and even though I did not hire them I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Mike LaForest profile picture
Mike LaForest
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
All the attorneys are exceptional and they all work collaboratively on your case. While I worked closely with David, the other attorney's where always up to date and provided unparalleled guidance. Bottom line, they are a cut above and they deliver. You get what you pay for. If it matters, talk to DM Cantor.
Free Initial Consultation
Open 24/7
Free Initial Consultation

Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success

Call Now Button