(602) 307-0808

Call Now, Open 24/7

Excellent Google Reviews, Best Criminal Defense Lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona

Miscellaneous Crime Pre-Charge Victories

Ranking Arizona Logo
Super Lawyers Logo
Avvo Logo

Miscellaneous Crime Pre-Charge Victories

Not Charged/ “Turned Down” (by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office) | Felony Conspiracy (3 Counts), Felony Money Laundering ($1,000,000+), (2 Counts) Felony Illegal Control of an Enterprise, Felony Participating in a Criminal Syndicate, Felony Theft, Felony Use of a Wire Communication to Facilitate a Felony, Felony Facilitation, Felony Solicitation, Felony Compounding, and Felony Attempt

State v. Mr. J (DMC No. 17646)

Phoenix Police Department and Arizona Attorney General’s Office Investigated (SW No. 20XX-XXXXX4)

Not Charged (Due to “Insufficient Evidence”) | Juvenile Felony Unlawful Use of an Electronic Communication by a Minor, Juvenile Felony Distribution of Child Pornography, and (3 Counts) Juvenile Felony Sexual Exploitation of a Minor

State v. Mr. F (DMC No. 17981)

Surprise Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX7)

Not Charged/”Case Closed” | Felony Failure to Report a Sex Crime as a Mandatory Reporter (11-year-old Minor/33-year-old Adult) Dangerous Crimes Against Children, and Felony Child Abuse/Neglect

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 17658)

Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXO)

Not Charged/”Unsubstantiated” | Felony Failure to Report a Sex Crime as a Mandatory Reporter (11 and 17-year-old Minors/34-year-old Adult), and Felony Child Abuse/Neglect

State v. Ms. S (DMC No. 17832)

Gilbert Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXXXX2) and Department of Child Safety Investigated

Not Charged (and Title IX Violation Dismissed at Hearing) | Federal Felony Counterfeiting US Currency, and Federal Felony Forgery

State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 8614)

Phoenix Police Department and Apollo High School Investigated (Title IX No. 0XXXXXX0)

Not Charged (Due to Cooperation Deal) | Federal Felony Embezzlement/Fraudulent Schemes ($20,404), Federal Felony Wire Fraud, Federal Felony Theft, Federal Felony Money Laundering, and Federal Felony Conspiracy

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 15733)

FBI and United States Attorney’s Office Investigated (Case No. CR-XX-XXXXX-PHX-XXX)

Not Charged (Due to Cooperation Deal) | Federal Felony Assisting a Terrorist Organization, Federal Felony Bank and Wire Fraud ($90,000), and Federal Felony Money Laundering

State v. Mr. V (DMC No. 16108)

Federal Bureau of Investigation and Ohio/Arizona United States Attorney Offices Investigated

Not Charged (Due to a Cooperation Deal with the United States Attorney’s Office) | Federal Felony International Arms Dealing, and Federal Felony Money Laundering ($110,000)

State v. Mr. N (DMC No. 17101)

United States Department of Justice Investigated (Case No. MC-XX-XXXX5-PHX-XXX)

Not Charged (Due to Cooperation Deal) | Federal Felony Assisting a Terrorist Organization ($685,694 in Illegal Deposits), Federal Felony Conspiracy, Federal Felony Bank and Wire Fraud, and Federal Felony Money Laundering

State v. Mr. V (DMC No. 17123)

Ohio FBI Agents Investigated, and Cooperation with the United States Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Georgia

Not Charged | Felony Conspiracy, Felony Illegally Conducting an Enterprise, Felony Possession of Narcotic Drugs for Sale (1,000 THC Cartridges), Felony Money Laundering, and Felony Possession of Narcotic Drugs

State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 18288)

GOODYEAR POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXXX8) AND MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (CASE NO. PF 20XX-XXXXX1)

Not Charged/”Turned Down for Prosecution” (and Press Conference Held by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office) | Felony Second Degree Murder (Dangerous), Felony Negligent Homicide (Dangerous), and Felony Tampering with Evidence

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 18503)

PEORIA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 2021-00055089)

Not Charged | False Reporting (Regarding Car Theft) | State v. Ms. P.

Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 2019-01788418) (DMC NO. 17451)

Not Charged | Securing a False Arizona Driver’s License | State v. Mr. Z.

ADOT Investigated (DMC NO. 13844)

Not Charges | Interfering with an Educational Institution | State v. Mr. S.

Pinal County Sheriff’s Department Investigated (DR No. 050819029) (DMC NO. 7433)

Not Charged | Interfering with a Public Institution (Bomb Threat) | State v. Mr. W.

Scottsdale Police Department investigated (DR No. 14-26185) (DMC NO. 14278)

Not Charged | Urinating in Public | State v. Mr. D.

Glendale Police Department Investigated (DMC NO. 14031)

Not Charged | Contributing to Delinquency of a Minor, and Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor | State v. Mr. R.

Tempe Police Department Investigated (DR No. TE2021-114989) (DMC NO. 17494)

Not Charged | Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor (Alcohol), and Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor | State v. Ms. M.

Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DR No. 2012-01266277) (DMC NO. 11372)

Not Charged | Contributing to Delinquency of a Minor | State v. Ms. M.

Peoria Police Department Investigated (IR No. 2019-00052555) (DMC NO. 17499)

Not Charged | Contribution to the Delinquency of a Minor | State v. Ms. A.

Peoria Police Department Investigated (DR No. 2014-00034867) (DMC NO. 12958)

Not Charged | Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor | State v. Ms. S.

Phoenix Police Department Investigated (DMC NO. 14680)

Not Charged | Felony Possession of Marijuana, Felony Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, Minor in Consumption and Minor in Possession | State v. Mr. M.

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 2015-10225) (DMC NO. 15104)

Not Charged | Trespass, Failure to Obey a Police Officer, Disorderly Conduct and (2 Counts) Criminal Damage | State v. Ms. C.

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 2017-09805) (DMC NO. 15169)

Not Charged Due to Lack of Corpus Delicti | DUI, DWI (.133 BAC) and MIC | State v. Mr. K

PAYSON POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2016-00008141) (DMC NO. 14571)

Not Charged | Felony Custodial Interference | State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 13542)

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 13542)

(PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT DR2014-00120362)

Not Charged due to Diversion Agreement | Offensive Conduct in Public, Open Container, Super Extreme DWI (.263 BAC), Extreme DWI, DUI & DWI | State vs. Mr. C

LAKE HAVASU CITY COURT (CASE NO. MCR-2014-00730) (DMC NO. 12225)

Not Charged | Federal Felony Mail Schemes, Felony Wire Fraud, Felony Fraud & Felony Computer Tampering ($100,000)

U.S. v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 10740)

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AND U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Felony Escape

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 6645)

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. 06-19488)

Not Charged | Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor and Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 5265)

MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE (DR NO. 2004-072428)

Not Charged | Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor and Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor

State v. Mr. D. (DMC No. 4688)

SKYLINE HIGH SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | (2 Counts) Felony Aggravated Assault Dangerous (with Knife); (2 Counts) Felony Disorderly Conduct Dangerous; (1 Count) Prevention of Use of a Telephone in an Emergency | State v. Mr. B

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-03890) (DMC NO. 13464)

Not Charged | Felony Custodial Interference

State v. Mr. P. (DMC No. 7390)

(GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED)

Not Charged | Conspiracy to Hinder Prosecution

State v. Mr. B. (DMC No. 10363)

(CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED)

Not Charged | Felony Burglary, Felony Possession Of Stolen Property & False Reporting | State V. Mr. F

GILBERT POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR14-000006105) (DMC NO. 12964)

Not Charged | Felony Misconduct with Weapon, Felony Tampering with Physical Evidence & Misdemeanor Failure to Comply with a Police Officer

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 4437)

TOLLESON POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2004-0503028)

Not Charged | Felony Depositing Explosives

State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 10236)

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT (DR NO. 11-05-2808)

Not Charged | Felony Tampering with Evidence

State v. Ms. L. (DMC No. 10984)

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. JC2007-157045)

Not Charged | Perjury and False Swearing

State v. Mr. B. (DMC No. 9560)

MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED

Not Charged | Possession of Multiple False Drivers License | State v. Mr. A

ARIZONA MVD INVESTIGATED (DMC NO. 14484)

Dismissed | Hit & Run

State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 9800)

PHOENIX CITY COURT / PHOENIX MUNICIPAL COURT (CASE NO. 2010-01460055)

Not Charged | Federal Felony Impersonating a DEA Agent

U.S. v. Mr. L (DMC No. 4016)

U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT OF ARIZONA

Not Charged | Minor in Possession of Alcohol & Minor in Consumption of Alcohol

State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 7064)

(TEMPE PD INVESTIGATED)

Not Charged in Exchange for Plea of Hit & Run | False Reporting & Criminal Damage | State v. Ms. D

MESA CITY COURT (CASE NO. CR2005-070160) (DMC NO. 5969)

Not Charged | Hit and Run and False Information to a Police Officer| State v. Mr. P

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2013-00514564; NO. DR2013-00514850) (DMC NO. 12062)

Not Charged | Juvenile Felony Possession of Marijuana, Juvenile Felony Possession of Drug Paraphernalia & Juvenile Misdemeanor False Reporting

State v. Ms. J (DMC No. 6784)

MARICOPA COUNTY JUVENILE COURT (CASE NO. O6-000010776)

Not Charged | Felony Insurance Fraud & Misdemeanor False Reporting & DUI | State v. Mr. M

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR05-02-6752) (DMC NO. 6759)

Not Charged | Felony Theft & Misdemeanor False Information to Police Officer | State v. Mr. S

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR09-15670) (DMC NO. 10641)

Not Charged | False Reporting to a Police Officer | State v. Ms. M

Department of Public Safety Investigated (CASE NO. I23026190) (DMC NO. 18532)

Not Charged/”Turned Down” (By Maricopa County Attorney’s Office for “No Likelihood of Conviction”) | Hazing, and Assault | State v. Mr. C

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Juvenile Division (CASE NO. JV1205577) (DMC NO. 18493)

Not Charged As To Our Client Mr. G /Former Owner of Bagdad Hillside | (3 Counts) Felony Discharge Elimination System Violation ($950,000 Violation)

State v. Bagdad Hillside LLC (DMC No. 15240)

MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (CASE NO. CR2017-002439)

DM Cantor, Best Criminal Defense Lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona
Posted on Google Google
matt harrell profile picture
matt harrell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Jason Karpel at DM assigned his team of David Campbell and Leah Dodd, which did an amazing job, being very attentive and making themselves available anytime we needed a conversation. This team worked out everything I needed and highly recommend this firm for anything !!! Thank you DM Cantor Team !
Posted on Google Google
Paul Zellner profile picture
Paul Zellner
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great lawyers!!!
Posted on Google Google
Seb profile picture
Seb
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The legal team at DM Cantor is absolutely phenomenal. They helped me win my case and made me feel at home throughout the whole process. I am extremely grateful I chose DM Cantor for legal help, and I cannot recommend them enough!
Posted on Google Google
Adam Flood profile picture
Adam Flood
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Fantastic office, clean, and amazing artwork. Plus final boss sour!
Posted on Google Google
Kevin McDermott profile picture
Kevin McDermott
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I worked with Nick Boca and Robyn McCraw. I felt I was in the best of hands from the beginning. They were clear and upfront at all times with their communication and instruction. Any divorce is a difficult time, and Nick and Robyn understand that. Their compassion for my situation and professionalism in how they handled my case stood out the most. I would highly recommend their services to anyone going through a difficult divorce. KM
Posted on Google Google
Peggy profile picture
Peggy
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Cantor Law Group came as a recommendation from a family friend, and I am so grateful that this led me to speak with Nicholas Boca. Nik represented me in a complicated divorce which detailed a substantial claim of waste that spanned my 25-year marriage. He was very straightforward and honest and worked purposefully on my behalf at all times. He was empathetic to my situation and found ways to navigate difficult challenges unique to my case. Perhaps most importantly, he understood the importance of bringing closure to my situation and did his best to avoid unnecessary legal expenses. His methods to find resolution required wisdom and experienced practice of law. My heartfelt gratitude also extends to Robyn and Amanda. This was a team effort. Amanda’s knowledge of law, Robyn’s organizational skills and instinctive nature were invaluable. My “team” at Cantor Law Group cared. My case mattered, I mattered, my family mattered. From the front desk to the billing department, everyone handled my inquiries and needs without delay. Each person I interacted with seemed to know me personally and I felt reassured they were all working together to achieve the best possible outcome. Cantor Law Group has an excellent reputation amongst the experts. It was extremely reassuring knowing that the work ethic and professionalism of Cantor Law Group is respected by both the experts and the court. I would HIGHLY recommend Cantor Law group.
Posted on Google Google
Ayoub Abouri profile picture
Ayoub Abouri
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Met with Jason for a consultation. He was very honest and upfront. I appreciate the advice and information. I’m very happy I came in and even though I did not hire them I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Mike LaForest profile picture
Mike LaForest
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
All the attorneys are exceptional and they all work collaboratively on your case. While I worked closely with David, the other attorney's where always up to date and provided unparalleled guidance. Bottom line, they are a cut above and they deliver. You get what you pay for. If it matters, talk to DM Cantor.
Free Initial Consultation
Open 24/7
Free Initial Consultation

Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success

Call Now Button