Whether in the Phoenix area, or anywhere in Arizona, pursuant to ARS §13-3406, §13-3407(A)(4), and §13-3408(A)(3), it is unlawful to manufacture, or to posses the equipment to manufacture, dangerous drugs, prescription-only drugs, and narcotics.
The prosecution typically charges possession of manufacturing materials when a defendant possesses certain chemicals or items which could be used to manufacture these drugs. Many times this is what is known as a “meth lab.” A person can be criminally convicted for simply possessing the manufacturing equipment without actually manufacturing a single dose of the drug.
Manufacturing of Dangerous Drugs Cases Dismissed
Need an Arizona Drug Defense Lawyer? Contact DM Cantor if you have been charged with the Manufacture of Dangerous or Prescription Drugs. Call 24/7 602-307-0808 for a Free Consultation.
Possible Punishment for Manufacture of Dangerous Drugs
If a defendant is convicted of manufacturing, or possessing equipment and chemicals for the purpose of manufacturing a prescription-only drug, it is a class one (1) misdemeanor. A class one (1) misdemeanor is punishable by a term of probation or up to six (6) months in jail, and a fine of up to $2,500.00. Additionally, the defendant must pay a separate fine of $1,000.
If a person is charged with a class three (3) felony for simply possessing the manufacturing equipment for a dangerous drug or a narcotic, then the sentence range on a first offense is anywhere from probation with zero (0) days in jail up to one (1) year in jail, or two (2) years to eight and three quarters (8.75) years in prison. If a person has one (1) allegeable historical prior felony conviction, the “prison only” range will be three and one half (3.5) years to sixteen and one quarter (16.25) years in prison. If the person has two (2) allegeable historical prior felony convictions then the “prison only” range will be seven and one half (7.5) years to twenty-five (25) years in prison.
If the person is found to actually have manufactured dangerous drugs or narcotics, they can then be charged with a class two (2) felony. If the drug manufactured is in an amount that is at, or above the statutory threshold amount, then the defendant is not eligible for probation and prison is required. The “prison only” range is three (3) years to twelve and one half (12.5) years of incarceration. If a person has one (1) allegeable historical prior felony conviction (regardless if the current case is “above” or “below” threshold), then the “prison only” range is four and one half (4.5) years to twenty-three and one quarter (23.25) years of incarceration. If the person has two (2) allegeable historical prior felony convictions, then the “prison only” range is ten and one half (10.5) years to thirty-five (35) years of incarceration.
Some common drug “threshold” amounts which require a mandatory prison sentence are nine (9) grams for methamphetamine, nine (9) powdered grams of cocaine or three quarter (3/4) gram in rock (crack) form, one (1) gram of heroin, a half (1/2) millimeter of LSD or fifty (50) dosage units (blotter form), or four (4) grams or fifty (50) milliliters of PCP. If the amount is below the threshold amount, then a first offense can carry anywhere from probation with zero (0) days to one (1) year in jail, or prison of three (3) years to twelve and one half (12.5) years of incarceration.
Possible Defenses for Manufacture of Dangerous Drugs
The key to defending against a Possession of Manufacturing Equipment charge is demonstrating that you did not “knowingly” possess the equipment (i.e., “Lack of Knowledge”). For example, if you live in a household with multiple roommates and you were unaware that your roommates were engaging in this type of drug activity or had these items in your house. We would present evidence that the defendant’s fingerprints are not on the chemicals or the manufacturing equipment itself, it was in a separate area of the house, and all the other people that had access and ownership over the equipment. We would also use this same evidence to defend against a Manufacturing of Drugs charge; that the defendant was not the person using any of the equipment. Even if a defendant has knowledge that his roommates are engaging in this type of activity, as long as he does not knowingly participate and facilitate the illegal enterprise, then they are not guilty of Manufacturing Dangerous Drugs, nor are they guilty of Possessing the Manufacturing Equipment. (These defenses of course assume that the equipment is not in the defendant’s actual bedroom or some other place under his exclusive control, and it was out in a garage area or other separate location.) Additionally, even if the equipment is the defendant’s. we would present evidence that the defendant was not using the equipment to manufacture drugs. There are many perfectly legal reasons that a person would have in their possession an object or objects that could be used to manufacture drugs. It does not mean that the defendant was actually using the objects to manufacture drugs.
Additionally, because our law firm fights conviction from all angles, we would assert a wide range of defenses and challenges to constitutional violations that apply in all criminal cases. The possibilities are numerous and diverse. One of those we frequently assert is a “Miranda rights violation.” In Arizona, the standard of whether any incriminating statement (i.e., a statement which tends to admit guilt) is admissible into evidence is based upon a “voluntariness” standard. If we can demonstrate that the police coerced you (i.e., intimidated or tricked you) into making a confession or inculpatory statement, or that they did not properly read you your Miranda Rights, then we can suppress those statements and any evidence gathered as a direct result of those statements. In addition, the “denial of right to Counsel” is another common defense which is often raised. This occurs when a suspect is in custody and requests to speak to their attorney, but is denied and questioning continues. Other defenses may include challenging the validity of any search warrant, or whether there were any “forensic flaws” during the investigation of your case. Depending on what else you have been charged with, this could include exposing flawed procedures regarding blood, breath, and urine testing; fingerprints analysis; DNA testing; ballistics; gunshot residue testing; computer analysis/cloning hard drive procedures; forensic financial accounting reviews; etc.. Lastly, one of the most common defense tactics is exposing sloppy or misleading police reports which include everything from misstatements, false statements, flawed photo line-ups and inaccurate crime scene reconstruction. It is important to hire a skilled Manufacture of Drugs lawyer to defend you who has knowledge of all the possible defenses to assert in your case. Be sure you review our Manufacture of Dangerous Drugs case wins.
It is important to hire an AV® rated law firm (the highest possible rating by Martindale Hubbell®). Also David Michael Cantor is an Arizona Drug Defense Lawyer and a Certified Criminal Law Specialist, per the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization. In addition, the Firm and all of it’s lawyers are listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers®. At DM Cantor, P.C., the majority of our Attorneys are ex-Prosecutors, and all of our Arizona Drug Defense Lawyers know the system well. For a Free Initial Consultation, call us at 602-307-0808.
Contact DM Cantor and speak to an Arizona Drug Defense Lawyer. We will assist you with your Manufacture of Dangerous Drugs case.