Our Location

40 N. Central Ave, Suite 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Free Consultation

(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
May 4, 2012
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1 DUI / Vehicular Crime Jury Trial Complete Acquittals, 1000 Complete Jury Trial Acquittals / All Criminal Charges, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, Case Victories, Jury Trial Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 10544)

Not Guilty / Complete Acquittal / DUI & DWI (.107 BAC) – State v. Mr. B. (San Tan Justice Court No. TR-2011-146484):  Mr. B. had been drinking at the Salt River and was stopped by the highway patrol.  The officer noted signs and symptoms of impairment and a DUI investigation ensued.  Mr. B. submitted to a breath test that resulted in alcohol content readings of .107 and .104.  Mr. B. was charged with two counts of DUI.  The State did not offer Mr. B. a significant plea offer.  At trial, after attacking the credibility the breath sample, the jury found Mr. B. not guilty of all the DUI charges.

December 18, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1300 Bench Trial Victories, 1300B Dismissed at Bench Trial, 16J Driving on a Suspended License Victories, Case Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State v. Ms. A (DMC No.7309)

DISMISSED at BENCH TRIAL | DRIVING ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE – State v. Ms. A. (DMC No.7309) (San Tan Justice Court No. TR06-0651336): Ms. A. had prior driving tickets which resulted in the suspension of her license. Although she had a prior Driving on a Suspended License, she thought she had adequately taken care of her license issues. When she was pulled over for a brake light violation, she was arrested and charged with Driving on a Suspended License. We were able to show that the DMV had mailed Ms. A. a Notice of Suspension approximately 5 months after the actual driving suspension date began. When it came time for a trial to the Judge, the State was unable to proceed and charges were dismissed.

January 7, 2000
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, Case Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No.)

(San Tan Justice Court No. 03-04139CR): Officers were called regarding a vehicle traveling erratically. Mr. M. was seen making a wide turn without using a turn signal. After he was stopped, he stated he’d had 1 beer, and he was subsequently arrested. He asked to speak with a lawyer, and he refused to answer the officer’s questions. Because his breath test was below the legal limit, in compass with the exaggeration by the officers, we were able to convince the prosecutor to dismiss all charges.

To find out more about DUI defense in Gilbert, AZ, click here. If you want a free consultation for a DUI charge, call our offices today (602) 307-0808.

January 7, 2000
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, Case Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. G. (DMC No.)

(San Tan Justice Court No. 03-09845CR): Mr. G. was stopped by Gilbert Police for allegedly speeding. Upon contact, the officer claimed he had an odor of alcohol and was traveling at 80 mph in a 65 mph zone. Mr. G. submitted to a breath test, which resulted in a low BAC, yet the officer stated that he performed poorly on Field Sobriety Tests. Due to the facts of the case and our threat of trial, we were able to dismiss the prosecutor to dismiss the DUI charges.

Do you need a DUI attorney for San Tan Justice Court? If you want to speak with an attorney now, please give us a call at (602) 307-0808.

February 6, 1999
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 6 Extreme DWI Reduced, Case Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State vs. Mr. P (DMC No. 9894)

REDUCED | EXTREME DUI (.166 BAC) State vs. Mr. P. (DMC No. 9894) (San Tan Justice Court No. TR2010-153516): DPS Officers state that they saw Mr. P. travelling 84 m.p.h. on radar where the 202 interstate intersects with State Route 60.  He ultimately pulled over properly, but they claimed he performed poorly on the field sobriety test.  Mr. P. told officers that he had knee problems and that he had a prior concussion.  Eventually he was given a breath test which revealed a .166 breath alcohol content.  Due to the questionability of the field sobriety test, we were able to negotiate the prosecutor to a plea of regular DUI with 1 day in jail instead of an Extreme DUI with 30 days in jail.

Call our offices at (602) 307-0808 to schedule a free consultation with a Chandler DUI Attorney to talk about your case.

1 2
Call Now Button