NOT CHARGED | 6 COUNTS of SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR – State v. Mr. W. (DMC No. 9684) (Phoenix Police Department Investigated): Mr. W. was a 21 year old man who was dating his 17 year old girlfriend for several months. After he broke up with his girlfriend, she became upset and went to her mother and told her that the two of them had been sleeping together. She then called the Police in order to have Mr. W. charged with 6 counts of Sexual Conduct with a Minor, under ARS 13-1405. Because there was no physical evidence and we invoked Mr. W.’s rights to remain to silent to the Police, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office declined to file charges against Mr. W. If he would have been charged and convicted it is possible that he would have to have done prison time and his future employment chances would have been greatly diminished.

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – State v. Mr. C. (DMC No. 8881) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office Investigated): Mr. C. and his wife were friends with another woman and her boyfriend.  All of them were at Mr. C.’s house, along with their children when they had stayed overnight.  Approximately two weeks later, the woman’s ex-husband called Mr. C. and accused him of touching his 11 year old daughter who had spent the night there previously.  Mr. C. denied this, got off the phone and immediately contacted his wife and the child’s mother.  The call that he had received was a tape recorded call set up by the Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office as a “Confrontation Call”.  We became involved and discovered that the alleged victim did not like living with her mother and wanted to move back with her father.   We met with Detectives and offered to do a Voice Stress Analysis and a Polygraph test.  After this “free talk” was conducted, the County Attorney’s Office declined to file any charges.  Mr. C. had been facing a minimum of 20 years in prison based on the allegations.

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION | State v. Mr. L. (DMC No. 8880) (Surprise Police Department Investigated): Mr. L. was divorced and had shared custody of his two daughters (12 and 13 years old).  The day before allegations were made of Molest, his 13 year old daughter was suspended from school for handing out medication to other students.  She was grounded and could not have her friends over.  This is when she made allegations that Mr. L. touched her.  Mr. L.’s ex-wife immediately filed for Sole Custody and got CPS involved along with police.  We sat down with police in order to conduct a “free talk”, and offered to have Mr. L. polygraph.  The CPS investigation was shut down and no criminal charges were brought against Mr. L.  However, his ex-wife was able to leverage these allegations in order to have Temporary Order issued by the Family Law Court, which gave her Temporary Custody of the 13 year old.

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – State v. Mr. P. (DMC No. 8923) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office and Scottsdale Police Department Investigated): Mr. P. was involved in a particularly nasty divorce in which his ex-wife was seeking to get sole custody of their 4 year old son.  She had made allegations that the 4 year old had claimed Mr. P. had touched his penis during bath time.  We had a polygraph conducted on Mr. P. (in which he passed), and we also sat down with Scottsdale Police Department Detectives in which they conducted a polygraph.  We were able to show through the prior divorce proceedings that Mr. P.’s ex-wife was particularly relentless.  Due to the evidence we provided, no charges were brought against Mr. P.  He was facing a minimum of 10 to 23 years in prison before we had the case shut down.

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION (2 counts) NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 5575) (Apache Junction Police Department Investigated): Mr. H. had four daughters.  The two youngest daughters were in high school and had become a perpetual problem for Mr. H. and Mrs. H.  They had accused him of various crimes (including sexual crimes) in the past, and those allegations were quickly shot down.  A new Detective came on board, and new allegations were made against Mr. H.  The Detective attempted a “confrontation call”, in which the alleged victims called Mr. H. and attempted to illicit a confession.  He denied all allegations.  We then had him submit to a polygraph test (in which he passed), we also offered Mr. H. to sit down for a “free talk” and a “voice stress test” with a Detective.  Although Mr. H. was facing potentially life in prison, no charges were brought against him.

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR (DCAC)/CHILD MOLESTATION (DCAC) | State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 4630) (Prescott Valley Police Department Investigated): Mr. M.’s 7 year old daughter was taken in by his wife to the doctor for a yeast infection.  The Doctor then advised the wife that he felt the 7 year old had been molested.  Mr. M.’s wife immediately got a Restraining Order and contacted police.  We were able to have Mr. M. take a polygraph test, in which he passed.  This all was submitted to the Prescott Valley Police Department Investigator, and no charges were brought against Mr. M.  During divorce proceedings, it was discovered that Mr. M.’s soon to be ex-wife may have manufactured allegations in order to gain an advantage regarding child custody.  Mr. M. was originally facing a minimum of 13 to 27 years in prison before we had these allegations shot down.

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 4624) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office Investigated): Mr. M.’s best friend had a 4 year old daughter, and they would come to Mr. M.’s house for picnic’s and BBQ’s.  Mr. M. was at one of these BBQ’s, when the 4 year olds mother accused him of improperly touching the 4 year old.  He denied these allegations and told the victim’s mom to call the cops and to go have her checked.  He did not have any contact with his best friend, best friend’s wife or the alleged victim for the next 2 years.  The Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office then appeared on his doorstep and began accusing him.  He retained our services, and we had him take a polygraph test and we spoke with Detectives.  No charges were ever brought regarding these false allegations.

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONUCT with a MINOR (DCAC)/CHILD MOLESTATION (DCAC) – State v. Mr. G. (DMC No. 10166) (Globe Police Department Investigated): Mr. G.’s step daughter was 38 years old when her and her new husband borrowed $45,000 from Mr. G. and his wife.  When they began to miss payments, he threatened to sue her for the balance.  She then made allegations that he had sex with her and molested her when she was a minor, and she reported this to police.  We sat down with Detectives and allowed them to conduct a “free talk” with Mr. G., and he also consented to a polygraph.  Not only did the Globe Police Department decline to route the case for charges, a lawsuit was also filed on Mr. G.’s behalf to recover the $45,000 that he was owed.