Our Location

40 N. Central Ave, Suite 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Free Consultation

(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
December 21, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 24-25A Child Pornography Victories, 25 Child Pornography Reduced, 26-27 Luring a Minor Victories, 27 Luring a Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38C Furnishing Harmful or Obscene Materials to a Minor, Case Victories

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 13767)

(4 Counts) Felony Luring a Minor for Sexual Exploitation (Dangerous Crimes Against Children), (3 Counts) Felony Sexual Exploitation of a Minor) (DCAC) & (4 Counts) Felony Furnishing Harmful or Obscene Materials to a Minor Reduced to 4 Amended Counts with 10 Years in Prison – State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 13767) (Santa Cruz Superior Court CR-15-136):

Mr. B was a teacher at an elementary school in which he had an 8thgrade female student.  The student began receiving threatening texts from other students who were cyber-bullying her.  This resulted in the police becoming involved and analyzing her phone.  During their investigation, they found text messages which were inappropriate between Mr. B and the victim.  There were also nude photographs which had been exchanged.

A search warrant was executed on Mr. B’s phone and at his house the next day.  He was interviewed and admitted to exchanging nude photographs with the victim. He immediately submitted his resignation and surrendered to law enforcement.  Because the victim was 13 years of age, and he was 27 years of age and in a position of authority (i.e. her teacher), he was charged with 11 felonies, which could have resulted in him spending the rest of his life in prison. After conducting a Psycho-Sexual Risk Evaluation which showed him to be an alcoholic, (in which he was drunk when he participated this crime), we were able to show that he was a low risk to re-offend if sober.  An offer was obtained which allowed the judge to sentence him as high as 12 years, but instead he was sentenced to only 10 years.  Because the charges were reduced, he has the chance to only do 8.5 years of that time if he behaves well in prison.  When he gets out, he will still have another 50 plus years of his life ahead of him as a free man.

December 21, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 23 Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct With Minor Reduced, 26-27 Luring a Minor Victories, 27 Luring a Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 12163)

(2 Counts) Felony Luring a Minor for Sexual Exploitation & (1 Count) Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor (Dangerous Crimes Against Children) Reduced to Attempt with 1 Year in Prison – State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 12163) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2014-000999):

Detectives had received a call from a grandparent stating that Mr. M had been contacting their 13 year old daughter on an internet site. Their conversations had gone on for months and were sexual in nature. They also showed that Mr. M had requested pictures of the 13 years old’s, breast, vagina and anus, and requested a video of her masturbating.  Mr. M was 22 years old and had an IQ of 80.  He was ultimately arrested and admitted to all of the activity.  Although Mr. M was originally facing a minimum of 10 to 24 years in prison on just one of the charges, we were able to demonstrate through Mitigation that due to his low IQ, Probation, or the lowest possible prison time, would be the most appropriate sentence.  We also presented a Psycho Sexual Risk Evaluation (PSRE) which demonstrated he was a low risk to re-offend.   He was ultimately given Probation with 1 year of Prison (in which he ultimately served only 10 months).

December 21, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 26-27 Luring a Minor Victories, 27 Luring a Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 37B Child Prostitution Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v Mr. L (DMC No. 13100)

Felony Child Prostitution, (2 Counts) Aggravated Luring a Minor for Sexual Exploitation & (4 Counts) Felony Luring a Minor for Sexual Exploitation Reduced to Solicitation to Commit Child Abuse with Probation and 120 Days in Jail with Work Furlough/Release – State v Mr. L (DMC No. 13100) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2014-160156):

Mr. L was on an internet chat room when he began conversations with a girl he believed to be 16 years old.  In reality, a Chandler Detective was pretending to be the 16 year old. Mr. L was 42 years old at the time, and began having sexually explicit conversations with the undercover Detective.  During those conversations, Mr. L admitted that he knew he could get in trouble because of her age and his age. He also asked for sexually explicit photographs from the Detective, and he allegedly sent pictures of his penis. They then made arrangements to meet at a gas station and he was asked if he could bring $75 dollars, some Mountain Dew and condoms to give to what he thought was a 16 year old girl.  When he pulls up at the gas station he is immediately arrested and is found to have the $75 dollars, the condoms, Mountain Dew and the cell phones in which he was communicating with the Detective.  When Mr. L was interviewed, he admitted to everything.

We were able to show that the photos found on the cell phones could not match as identifiers to link him directly to the photos. We also argued that the $75 dollars was not directly being used to pay her for sex, as they had already agreed to have sex prior to that conversation.  We stated it could be construed that the money was merely a gift, along with the Mountain Dew.  Ultimately, we were able to convince the prosecution to reduce the charges to Solicitation, and Mr. L was sentenced to Probation with 120 days in jail with work furlough/release.  He was originally facing the possibility of 7 to 21 years in prison.

December 21, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 23 Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct With Minor Reduced, 26-27 Luring a Minor Victories, 27 Luring a Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38C Furnishing Harmful or Obscene Materials to a Minor, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 12417)

Felony Luring a Minor for Sexual Exploitation, (5 Counts) Felony Sexual Conduct with a Minor and (1 Count) Felony Furnishing Harmful or Obscene Items to Minor Reduced to Child Abuse with Probation and 60 Days in Jail – State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 12417) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2014-119425):

Mr. M was employed as a Detention Officer at a local prison for the Arizona Department of Corrections. He had met a young woman at the State Fair who claimed to be 17 years old almost turning 18.  He started a physical relationship with her and an internet relationship with her where she would send him nude photographs at his request. The young woman turned out to be 15 years of age, which compounded difficulty in Mr. M’s case.  If she had stated she was 18 years of age, but was actually 15 years of age or older, he would have had a defense to the charges. Because she had started the relationship stating she was 17, he did not have that particular defense available. However, we were able to show that he was not a threat to his own minor children.  Therefore, he was allowed to have contact with his minor children while on probation, and he did not have to register as a sex offender.  He was also allowed to have computer access during the course of his probation.

December 21, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 26-27 Luring a Minor Victories, 27 Luring a Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 11380)

Felony Luring  a Minor for Sexual Exploitation Reduced to Attempted Child Abuse with Probation, Zero Additional Days in Jail and No Sex Offender Registration or Sex Offender Probation Terms – State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 11380) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2012-132313): Mr. M was on a internet chat line when he contacted a girl who identified herself as being 14 years old. This person was actually an undercover Detective posing as an underage child.  Detectives claimed that various sexually explicit conversations were had in which Mr. M attempted to have the girl go onto a webcam and masturbate.  They also said he invited her over on two different occasions to his house to go swimming, and stated he would be nude the entire time.

When he was arrested, he told police that he had no intention of ever touching the mythical 14 year old girl.  They claim he also told them he did not think it was illegal to talk to an underage girl into masturbating while on video.  We were able to demonstrate that he had no intention of actually making physical contact with anyone.  This was done through a polygraph test.   We also presented evidence that he was suffering from cancer and that being incarcerated would be detrimental to his health.  Lastly, we were able to argue for Interstate Compact which, allowed him to move out of state while on probation. All without any jail, sex offender registration or sex offender probationary terms.

December 20, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories Blog

What to do if You Are Arrested for a Felony in Arizona

If you have been arrested in Arizona for a felony charge, it is vital that you understand your rights. A felony conviction can have significant consequences and may result in revocation of certain rights. Rights such as the right to vote and to possess a firearm. Because of this, you should be mindful of your rights and should contact an Arizona defense attorney as soon as possible.

What are some of Your Rights after you are Arrested for a Felony?

After you are placed under arrest for a felony offense, you have certain constitutional rights that are intended to protect your interests. These rights include the following:

The right to remain silent

  • The right to remain silent: After you are arrested, you are under no obligation to speak with law enforcement about the event. Police officers are often well-trained in interrogation tactics and will seek to obtain information that could be used against you in court. The prosecution frequently relies upon admissions made by defendants or inferences that can be drawn from statements that are made. To protect yourself and to limit disclosure of information, you should exercise your right to remain silent, at least until such time that you have legal representation present.

…Click Here to Read the Full Article

December 6, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1 DUI / Vehicular Crime Jury Trial Complete Acquittals, 1000 Complete Jury Trial Acquittals / All Criminal Charges, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 909 Scottsdale DUI Wins, Case Victories, Jury Trial Victories, Scottsdale City Court Victories

State v. Ms. L (DMC No. 15440)

(Dec. 6, 2018) NOT GUILTY/COMPLETE ACQUITTAL at JURY TRIAL – SUPER EXTREME DWI (.235 BAC) & EXTREME DWI, DUI & DWI – State v. Ms. L (DMC No. 15440) (Scottsdale City Court TR2017-031349): At 2:53 in the morning, a Scottsdale Police Officer was patrolling the parking lot of Nordstrom’s Rack located in North Scottsdale.  The officer observed a vehicle that had driven up on the sidewalk in front of the Nordstrom’s Rack. The vehicle had its engine running, headlights and running lights illuminated.  Inside of the vehicle was Ms. L, who was asleep and her car was in drive.

When Ms. L was awakened, she did not recall how she got there.  She subsequently provided a blood test, which revealed a .235 BAC.  After she was released from custody, she found out that her former boss and his girlfriend had driven her to that location in their car. The three of them were at a holiday party where Ms. L had become extremely intoxicated.  Ms. L’s boss’s girlfriend began to yell at him, and he put her inside of the vehicle with the engine on and the heater running. He left a verbal message for one of her friends to come and get her. At the Scottsdale City Court trial, the boss came in and testified that he indeed and placed her in the vehicle and then started the engine. Since nobody knows how the car got up on the sidewalk or why it was in drive, the jury had reasonable doubt as to Ms. L actually operating the vehicle.  They found that she was not in “Actual Physical Control” and she was acquitted of all charges.

August 18, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories Blog

8 Top Tips to Prevent Motorcycle Accidents & Injuries

Riding a motorcycle is a thrilling experience. You can ride without the confines of another type of vehicle. You can get through smaller spaces when you are on a motorcycle, but you can also be in an accident a lot easier too.

It is very important to be careful on the road, and if you are in a motorcycle accident, you get the proper medical treatment and advice from a motorcycle accident lawyer to represent you in a court of law.

8 Useful Safety Tips While Riding on a Motorcycle

  1. One of the most important safety tips of riding a motorcycle is you must make sure that you know how to operate a motorcycle properly. This might take specific training and licensing. You need to understand how to brake, ride, start the bike and stop so that you are able to get around on the roads without being a hazard to other drivers. Make sure that you are comfortable with all the different aspects of operating a motorcycle before you take it out on the road for a drive. Have someone test you on the various aspects of driving one so that you are sure you understand all that there is about driving one.
  2. Clothing is important. You must make sure that you can be seen by the other drivers on the road. It is important to wear protective gear too. Just as important to children riding bicycles, a helmet can be the greatest protection from a head injury in an accident. Make sure that you and your passenger wear one at all times. Protection for your eyes is also necessary. You will want to also make sure that you have good shoes or boots and wear clothing that is protective to your body also.
  3. Do not take drugs or drink alcohol while you are driving a motorcycle. You will want to make sure that you are completely alert when taking to the road. If you are going on a long trip, make sure that you get the proper amount of sleep that you need in order to drive correctly. You want to make sure that you can get from point A to Point B without a problem.
  4. Be on guard when you are driving a motorcycle at any time of the day or night. Watch for other drivers, and pay attention to all the road signs, signals and lights. Make sure that you don’t drive if you are tired. Avoid accidents by being cautious and watching for any problems on the road because they can arise at any time.
  5. Refuse to get into any road rage when on the road. Don’t let other drivers get you upset because when you are on the road on a motorcycle, you can get in an accident very quickly. You need to keep your calm while you are operating a motorcycle because you have very minimal protection if you should get into an accident on the road.
  6. Night riding on a motorcycle can be very difficult. It is best to be very careful while driving at night. Always make sure that the bike is operating correctly, and the lights are on. Likewise, be careful in weather that isn’t up to par. Watch for rain, fog and other unusual weather events and pull off the road if you need to.
  7. Safety when trying to ride someone else’s motorcycle. You may not be familiar with how to operate it correctly and this can cause you more problems than it is worth. Make sure that you understand it before you take it out on the road or forego the ride. It isn’t worth getting into an accident just to show someone else that you can drive their motorcycle.
  8. Using caution and common sense is imperative when driving a motorcycle. Make sure that you understand that there is little protection if you are in an accident and drive accordingly. Always be as careful as possible while out on the road.

At Hutzler Law, we give you a free consultation to talk with our motorcycle accident lawyer professionals. With our experience and knowledge, we will be able to help you get the money that you deserve if you were injured in an accident involving a motorcycle. Your peace of mind is what we are looking for, so call us when you need us, and we will give you the best advice possible.

July 31, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1 DUI / Vehicular Crime Jury Trial Complete Acquittals, 1000 Complete Jury Trial Acquittals / All Criminal Charges, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 908 Phoenix DUI Wins, Case Victories, Jury Trial Victories, Phoenix City Court / Phoenix Municipal Court Victories

State v. Ms. M (DMC No. 15419)

(Jul. 31, 2018) NOT GUILTY/COMPLETE ACQUITTAL at JURY TRIAL – DUI & DWI (.142 BAC) – State v. Ms. M (DMC No. 15419) (Phoenix City Court 5260782): At 11:27 at night, two Phoenix Police Officers responded to a radio call of a suspicious vehicle at Happy Valley Road and 43rdAvenue.  When they arrived, they observed Ms. M sitting in her car, with her engine running and her phone charging.  She had a flat tire, and they surmised she had hit a curb. She told them she was waiting for a tow truck to arrive.

The officers then made her do Field Sobriety Tests, even though she was 65 years old.  This violates the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) rules, and the tests were shown to the jury not be valid.  Ultimately she provided a blood test which revealed a .142 BAC.  We argued to the jury that the State could not prove the actual time of driving, nor could they prove she was in “Actual Physical Control” of her vehicle.  We argued that she was merely using it as temporary shelter while waiting for a tow truck to arrive.  The jury acquitted her on all charges.

March 12, 2018
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 13875)

FELONY SEXUAL ASSAULT NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 13875) (Phoenix Police Department DR No. 2013-XXXXXXXX): Mr. W had engaged in consensual sex acts with a neighbor after an evening of partying. Both Mr. W and the neighbor whom he engaged in a sex acts with, had significant others at the time. Sometime after this consensual sex act, Mr. W received a telephone call from a Detective at the Phoenix Police Department. The Detective indicated he wanted to speak with him about an allegation of Sexual Assault per Arizona Revised Statute ARS 13-1406 being made by Mr. W’s female neighbor. Prior to the scheduled meeting, Mr. W’s contacted and retained our firm.  Once our services were retained, I met with the Pre-Charge team and we decided (1) order a copy of the transcripts from an Injunction Against Harassment hearing that had occurred prior to the contact with police, (2) obtain a copy of the police report regarding this investigation, (3) contact the Detective regarding the status of the investigation, and (4) send a Trebus letter to the Maricopa County Attorney’s office.

Immediately after being retained, we contacted the Detective who provided us with the police report number in this case. We advised that our client would not be speaking with the Detective at that time.  The Detective indicated the case would be “pending” for now.  We requested and received copies of the Order of Protection hearing approximately three weeks later. In that information it was determined there were numerous calls for service that had occurred to the alleged victim’s home. We submitted requests for these to determine if our theory that the alleged victim was scared of her boyfriend and what he would do to her (i.e., was there any history of domestic violence) which is why she would make up the false allegation of Rape.

Approximately a week after receiving the documents, we prepared a detailed Trebus/Bashir letter which was sent to the County Maricopa Attorney’s office. Just days after this Trebus/Bashir letter had been sent, Mr. W voluntarily submitted to a private polygraph examination which he passed.  After receiving the passed results from the polygraphist, we drafted a supplemental Trebus/Bashir letter and submitted it to the County Attorney’s Office. One week later, we had a discussion with the Detective about the polygraph and the passed results. The Detective requested a hard copy of the passed polygraph, which was sent to him. Just shy of one month later, we spoke with the Detective, who indicated that the case was in a “non-active status.” He indicated he would be working on getting a copy of the police report ready for. Later he confirmed that the case was not going any further.

1 … 26 27 28 29 30 … 177
Call Now Button