Our Location

40 N. Central Ave, Suite 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Free Consultation

(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
January 16, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1800 Sentence Modification Victories, 2100 Superior Court Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 4852)

GRANTED | MOTION TO MODIFY PROBATION FROM I.P.S. TO STANDARD / AGGRAVATED ASSAULT WITH GUN – State v. Mr. R. (DMC No. 4852) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2001-093948): Mr. R. had gotten drunk and then got into an argument with his wife in which a gun was discharged in the household. He was originally sentenced to a lengthy probation with 6 months of “deferred” jail. Upon successful complete of a in-patient treatment facility, that term was “deleted” and he was still to remain with Intensive Probation Services. We filed a Motion on his behalf in order to have IPS modified down to standard probation, and that was granted by the Judge. Eventually Mr. R. completed all probation successfully.

January 14, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1300 Bench Trial Victories, 1300C Partial Bench Trial Acquittal, 500 Assault / Violent Crime Victories, 57 Disorderly Conduct/Threats Dismissed, 57-59 Disorderly Conduct / Threats Victories, Case Victories, North Mesa Justice Court Victories

State v. Ms. G (DMC No. 6160)

PARTIAL AQUITTAL at BENCH TRIAL | DISORDERLY CONDUCT – State v. Ms. G. (DMC No. 6160) (North Mesa Justice Court JC2006117168): Ms. G. was on a bus with some friend’s when an argument broke out with another group of teenager’s. She had been drinking prior to this. She was charged with underage drinking, assault and disorderly conduct. At Bench Trial, the Judge found her not guilty of the disorderly conduct, due to the fact that she was not the one responsible for starting the initial fighting.

January 14, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1300 Bench Trial Victories, 1300A Complete Bench Trial Acquittal / All Criminal Charges, 16 Miscellaneous Vehicular Crimes Victories, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 2A Vehicular Crimes Bench Trial Victories, Case Victories, Justice Court Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. L. (DMC No. 10194)

NOT GUILTY/COMPLETE ACQUITTAL at BENCH TRIAL | AUTO DEALER WITHOUT a LICENSE – State v. Mr. L. (DMC No. 10194) (San Tan Justice Court TR2010-159658): Mr. L. was accused of properly owning a wholesale car dealership, and then improperly transferring ownership of those vehicles to a company that was not a licensed auto dealer. That company would then sell vehicles on EBay, thereby bypassing the need to pay any sales tax. His wholesale license only allowed him to sell to other wholesaler’s without paying sales tax. We were able to prove to the Judge that the transfer of title from his wholesaler to his unlicensed dealer business was not a “sale” under the statute. The Judge found Mr. L. not guilty of all charges.

January 14, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1300 Bench Trial Victories, 1300A Complete Bench Trial Acquittal / All Criminal Charges, 500 Assault / Violent Crime Victories, 57 Disorderly Conduct/Threats Dismissed, 57-59 Disorderly Conduct / Threats Victories, Case Victories, Justice Court Victories, University Lakes Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 4273)

NOT GUILTY/COMPLETE ACQUITTAL at BENCH TRIAL | DISORDERLY CONDUCT – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 4273) (University Lakes Justice Court CR03-01408): Mr. H. went into the Gilbert City Mayor’s Office in order to lodge a complaint. He was talking very loudly and he had a gun in a holster on his hip. He demanded to see the Mayor and said if he didn’t see him immediately “something is going to happen”, and he turned his hip which displayed the gun. At trial, we showed that he never touched the gun, handled the gun, or insinuated he was going to use a gun, and the Judge found him not guilty of all charges.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2100 Superior Court Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38B Sexual Abuse Victories, 38D Voyeurism Victories, Case Victories, Pinal County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 10749)

REDUCED | VOYEURISM / SEX ABUSE REDUCED to “surreptitious photographing” with probation and 90 days jail – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 10749) (Pinal County Superior Court CR2011-02322): Mr. M. was accused of going into a Walgreens drug store and placing his cell phone camera underneath a young lady’s skirt.  He was also accused of intentionally rubbing his elbow across her breast when he walked by. He was confronted by the young lady’s grandmother, and store employee’s arrested him.  Due to the fact that he was on probation for prior felony offenses, and due to allegations that he had done this in the same store previously, the prosecution originally wanted prison time.  We were able to present mitigating evidence and get the case reduced down to a simple “surreptitious photographing” with probation and 90 days of jail. Originally Mr. M. was facing well over 5 year in prison.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2100 Superior Court Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38E Surreptitious Recording Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. F (DMC No. 4737)

REDUCED | SURREPTITIOUS PHOTOGRAPHING REDUCED to “attempt” with probation and zero jail – State v. Mr. F. (DMC No. 4737) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2004-010581): Mr. F. was at home one day when he heard the neighbors dog barking frantically.  When he looked over the wall, the 18 year old neighbor came outside with no clothes on.  He discovered she would often engage in this behavior, and he took several photographs of her over the next 6 months with his camera over the wall.  When he dropped the roll of film off at the local drug store, they notified police.  He openly told police he didn’t realize it was illegal because he thought she was in public view.  It was explained that because he had to peer over the wall (i.e., above eye level), it was illegal.  Although the neighbor was highly upset, we were able to secure a plea to a simple “attempt” with probation and zero days of jail. Mr. F. was not required to register as a sex offender.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38 Miscellaneous Sex Crimes Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. & Mrs. E (DMC No. 10680)

NOT CHARGED | FAILURE TO REPORT CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. & Mrs. E. (DMC No. 10680) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office investigated): Mr. & Mrs. E. were told by their daughter that the neighbor’s son (a 22 year old with a mind of a 13 year old) had touched her.  Other allegations came from other kids in the neighborhood.  As the Sherriff’s Office began investigating, it became apparent that they were also investigating Mr. & Mrs. E. for failure to report a child sexual abuse.  We became involved, and helped facilitate not only the prosecution of the neighbor kid, but also we made sure no charges were ever brought against Mr. & Mrs. E.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38 Miscellaneous Sex Crimes Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. K (DMC No. 10225)

REDUCED | SEX OFFENDER LEVEL REDUCED – State v. Mr. K. (DMC No. 10225) (Phoenix Police Department modified): Mr. K. had previously been convicted of a felony charge of sex conduct with a minor in the State of California.  As part of his sentence, Mr. K. was required to register as a sex offender.  Upon moving to Arizona he was evaluated and considered to be a “level 2” sex offender.  We were able to work with the Phoenix Police Department, providing them documentation that supported a lower level of registration, and we received a reduction of Mr. K.’s sex offender classification down to a level 1.  As a result of this reclassification, Mr. K. is not subjected to having his name and photographed being displayed on the DPS sex offender website.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 100 Miscellaneous Crimes Victories, 1900 Federal Court Victories, 400 Theft / Fraud Crime Victories, 47D Bank, Mail and Wire Fraud (Federal Charge) Victories, 47E Money Laundering (Federal Charge) Victories, 800 Miscellaneous Crime Victories, Case Victories

U.S. v. Ms. V. (DMC No. 8945)

DISMISSED (ALL) | FEDERAL BANK and WIRE FRAUD/MONEY LAUNDERING/CONSPIRACY/AID and ABET ALL DISMISSED – State v. Ms. V.  (DMC No. 8945) (U.S. District Court of Arizona 2:08-CR08-0598-PHX-JAT-8): Ms. V. was an escrow officer with a local title agency in Phoenix.  She submitted several preliminary HUD-1 forms and some final HUD-1 forms for a “straw buyer” who purchased 27 homes while she was the escrow agent.  Allegations were that there was a “cash back scheme” which resulted in her receiving fees of $40, 000 dollars.  Although there were multiple co-defendants, we were able to show that Ms. V. was an unwilling victim duped into assisting this scheme.  Ultimately, all charges were dismissed in full.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 115 Assault/Violent Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38B Sexual Abuse Victories, 500 Assault / Violent Crime Victories, 66-68 Child/Vulnerable Adult Abuse Victories, 68 Child/Vulnerable Adult Pre-Charge Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 6747)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ABUSE/CHILD ABUSE  – State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 6747) (Mesa PD & CPS Investigated) : Mr. S. had custody of his two grade school children due to his ex-wife being a drug addict and abandoning them.  While at the school nurses office, the older sister stated that Mr. S. had struck the younger child with a belt.  In addition, she claimed that he once touched her breasts.  CPS and Mesa PD became involved, and they took photos and questioned Mr. S.  We became involved on the case, and we’re able to show that the son was ADHD and Mr. S. had not abused the child when he disciplined him for bad behavior.  In addition, we showed that the contact with the older daughter was not of a sexual nature.  No charges were ever brought against Mr. S.

1 … 89 90 91 92 93 … 160
Call Now Button