Urinating in Public Victories
“Victories” Definition: DM Cantor defines a “Victory” as a Complete Acquittal at Jury/Bench Trial; cases Dismissed after they were set for Jury/Bench Trial; cases Dismissed prior to being set for Jury/Bench Trial; Pre-Charge/Pre-Indictment cases where DM Cantor Prevented Charges from being filed; a Partial Acquittal at Jury/Bench Trial; cases in which Charges were Substantially Reduced; and cases where Prison/Jail exposure or Civil Repercussions were Substantially Reduced.
Disclaimer – Results depend upon factors unique to each case and that results in one case do not predict similar results in others.
Dismissed | Urinating in Public
SCOTTSDALE CITY COURT (CASE NO. 2004-20923)
Dismissed | Urinating in Public
TEMPE CITY COURT / TEMPE MUNICIPAL COURT (CASE NO. 11-010740)
Dismissed at Bench Trial with 10 Hours of Community Service | Urinating in Public | State v. Mr. L
SCOTTSDALE CITY COURT (CASE NO. 2013-031452) (DMC NO. 12359)
Dismissed | Urinating in Public, Assault and Disorderly Conduct | State vs. Ms. M
UNIVERSITY LAKES JUSTICE COURT (CASE NO. JC2013-416599) (DMC NO. 12148)
Conviction Set Aside | Urinating in Public | State v. Mr. S
SCOTTSDALE CITY COURT (CASE NO. SC2015-019510) (DMC NO. 13426)
Reduced to Nuisance with Zero Days in Jail | Urinating in Public | State v. Mr. P.
PEORIA CITY COURT (CASE NO. CR2007-001430) (DMC NO. 7791)
Dismissed | Urinating in Public | State v. Mr. D.
TEMPE CITY COURT (DMC NO. 8343)
Reduced to Reckless Driving with Zero Days in Jail | DUI (.056 BAC) and Public Urination | State v. Mr. M.
Tempe City Court (Case No. 2018-013523) (DMC NO. 15430)