Our Location

40 N. Central Ave, Suite 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Free Consultation

(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
January 22, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1600 Probation Violation Victories, Case Victories, Chandler City Court / Chandler Municipal Court Victories, City Court Victories

State v. Mr. J (DMC No. 10262)

PROBATION VIOLATION DISMISSED/THEFT – State v. Mr. J. (DMC No. 10262) (Chandler City Court 2008-C2997861):  Mr. J. was convicted of theft and sentenced to 1 year of probation along with diversion/dismissal classes.  He failed to complete those classes, and a petition to revoke his probation was issued.  We were able to show that he had been doing “in-patient” drug treatment, along with other counseling classes, and the Judge was convinced to dismiss the petition and to terminate Mr. J.’s probation completely.

January 22, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1600 Probation Violation Victories, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Phoenix City Court / Phoenix Municipal Court Victories

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 5180)

PROBATION REINSTATED/SHOPLIFITING – State v. Mr. R. (DMC No. 5180) (Phoenix City Court 2993756): Mr. R. was convicted in Superior Court of shoplifting at a Robinson’s-May Department store.  This resulted in a Petition to Revoke his probation on his three prior shoplifting charges out of the City of Phoenix.  We were able to go in and bring him current on fines and classes, and convince the court to not violate him.  They also gave him 2 additional months to complete shoplifting classes.

January 16, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1800 Sentence Modification Victories, 2100 Superior Court Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Ms. L (DMC No. 4336)

JAIL SENTENCE DEFERRED (60 days jail) | SOLICITATION TO POSSESS DANGEROUS DRUGS – State v. Ms. L. (DMC No. 4336) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2003-016182): Ms. L. was convicted of solicitation to possess dangerous drugs and sentenced to 2 years of probation. Her probation had been moved down to Pima County and she then hired us to delete a 60 day “deferred” jail term. Although she had several probation violations, we were able to bring her into compliance and have the jail term “deleted”.

January 16, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1800 Sentence Modification Victories, 2100 Superior Court Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 4852)

GRANTED | MOTION TO MODIFY PROBATION FROM I.P.S. TO STANDARD / AGGRAVATED ASSAULT WITH GUN – State v. Mr. R. (DMC No. 4852) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2001-093948): Mr. R. had gotten drunk and then got into an argument with his wife in which a gun was discharged in the household. He was originally sentenced to a lengthy probation with 6 months of “deferred” jail. Upon successful complete of a in-patient treatment facility, that term was “deleted” and he was still to remain with Intensive Probation Services. We filed a Motion on his behalf in order to have IPS modified down to standard probation, and that was granted by the Judge. Eventually Mr. R. completed all probation successfully.

January 14, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1300 Bench Trial Victories, 1300C Partial Bench Trial Acquittal, 500 Assault / Violent Crime Victories, 57 Disorderly Conduct/Threats Dismissed, 57-59 Disorderly Conduct / Threats Victories, Case Victories, North Mesa Justice Court Victories

State v. Ms. G (DMC No. 6160)

PARTIAL AQUITTAL at BENCH TRIAL | DISORDERLY CONDUCT – State v. Ms. G. (DMC No. 6160) (North Mesa Justice Court JC2006117168): Ms. G. was on a bus with some friend’s when an argument broke out with another group of teenager’s. She had been drinking prior to this. She was charged with underage drinking, assault and disorderly conduct. At Bench Trial, the Judge found her not guilty of the disorderly conduct, due to the fact that she was not the one responsible for starting the initial fighting.

January 14, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1300 Bench Trial Victories, 1300A Complete Bench Trial Acquittal / All Criminal Charges, 16 Miscellaneous Vehicular Crimes Victories, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 2A Vehicular Crimes Bench Trial Victories, Case Victories, Justice Court Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. L. (DMC No. 10194)

NOT GUILTY/COMPLETE ACQUITTAL at BENCH TRIAL | AUTO DEALER WITHOUT a LICENSE – State v. Mr. L. (DMC No. 10194) (San Tan Justice Court TR2010-159658): Mr. L. was accused of properly owning a wholesale car dealership, and then improperly transferring ownership of those vehicles to a company that was not a licensed auto dealer. That company would then sell vehicles on EBay, thereby bypassing the need to pay any sales tax. His wholesale license only allowed him to sell to other wholesaler’s without paying sales tax. We were able to prove to the Judge that the transfer of title from his wholesaler to his unlicensed dealer business was not a “sale” under the statute. The Judge found Mr. L. not guilty of all charges.

January 14, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 1300 Bench Trial Victories, 1300A Complete Bench Trial Acquittal / All Criminal Charges, 500 Assault / Violent Crime Victories, 57 Disorderly Conduct/Threats Dismissed, 57-59 Disorderly Conduct / Threats Victories, Case Victories, Justice Court Victories, University Lakes Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 4273)

NOT GUILTY/COMPLETE ACQUITTAL at BENCH TRIAL | DISORDERLY CONDUCT – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 4273) (University Lakes Justice Court CR03-01408): Mr. H. went into the Gilbert City Mayor’s Office in order to lodge a complaint. He was talking very loudly and he had a gun in a holster on his hip. He demanded to see the Mayor and said if he didn’t see him immediately “something is going to happen”, and he turned his hip which displayed the gun. At trial, we showed that he never touched the gun, handled the gun, or insinuated he was going to use a gun, and the Judge found him not guilty of all charges.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2100 Superior Court Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38B Sexual Abuse Victories, 38D Voyeurism Victories, Case Victories, Pinal County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 10749)

REDUCED | VOYEURISM / SEX ABUSE REDUCED to “surreptitious photographing” with probation and 90 days jail – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 10749) (Pinal County Superior Court CR2011-02322): Mr. M. was accused of going into a Walgreens drug store and placing his cell phone camera underneath a young lady’s skirt.  He was also accused of intentionally rubbing his elbow across her breast when he walked by. He was confronted by the young lady’s grandmother, and store employee’s arrested him.  Due to the fact that he was on probation for prior felony offenses, and due to allegations that he had done this in the same store previously, the prosecution originally wanted prison time.  We were able to present mitigating evidence and get the case reduced down to a simple “surreptitious photographing” with probation and 90 days of jail. Originally Mr. M. was facing well over 5 year in prison.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2100 Superior Court Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38E Surreptitious Recording Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. F (DMC No. 4737)

REDUCED | SURREPTITIOUS PHOTOGRAPHING REDUCED to “attempt” with probation and zero jail – State v. Mr. F. (DMC No. 4737) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2004-010581): Mr. F. was at home one day when he heard the neighbors dog barking frantically.  When he looked over the wall, the 18 year old neighbor came outside with no clothes on.  He discovered she would often engage in this behavior, and he took several photographs of her over the next 6 months with his camera over the wall.  When he dropped the roll of film off at the local drug store, they notified police.  He openly told police he didn’t realize it was illegal because he thought she was in public view.  It was explained that because he had to peer over the wall (i.e., above eye level), it was illegal.  Although the neighbor was highly upset, we were able to secure a plea to a simple “attempt” with probation and zero days of jail. Mr. F. was not required to register as a sex offender.

January 10, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38 Miscellaneous Sex Crimes Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. & Mrs. E (DMC No. 10680)

NOT CHARGED | FAILURE TO REPORT CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. & Mrs. E. (DMC No. 10680) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office investigated): Mr. & Mrs. E. were told by their daughter that the neighbor’s son (a 22 year old with a mind of a 13 year old) had touched her.  Other allegations came from other kids in the neighborhood.  As the Sherriff’s Office began investigating, it became apparent that they were also investigating Mr. & Mrs. E. for failure to report a child sexual abuse.  We became involved, and helped facilitate not only the prosecution of the neighbor kid, but also we made sure no charges were ever brought against Mr. & Mrs. E.

1 … 94 95 96 97 98 … 177
Call Now Button