(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
In Arizona, guilty pleas and verdicts are often viewed as the end of the legal process for those charged with crimes. After a jury has made its decision, how can a defendant do anything to help himself? In some cases, however, Arizona law provides a process by which an individual can appeal his or her guilty verdict or plea.
Watch this short video where David explains Arizona Rule 32/33 in Arizona:
Under rule 32/33 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, an individual may appeal a conviction for one of three reasons: ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or substantive change of law. Ineffective assistance of counsel refers to situations in which a defendant’s lawyer provided unprofessional or substandard representation that materially affected the outcome of the court proceedings. It is not enough to prove that a defendant received poor representation; you must also prove that the outcome of the case would have been better had you received more effective counsel.
Substantive change of law allows for relief to defendants convicted under certain criminal statutes that have since been changed. Recent developments in Arizona statutory law have made this category of rule 32/33 all the more important. A substantial proportion of cases dealing with violent or deadly force fall under the umbrella of “justifiable use of force” cases. In these cases, the defendant does not deny that he committed a violent act but argues that he did so for a justifiable reason, such as the defense of property or of his own life. Until 1997, Arizona law required that prosecutors prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant did not act in a justifiable manner. That is, the burden of proof was on the prosecution to disprove the defendant’s claim of justifiable use of force.
In 1997, the law was changed so that the defendant now had the responsibility to demonstrate that the preponderance of the evidence supported the view that he acted in a justifiable manner. Thus, the burden of proof shifted to the defendant.
Finally, in 2006 the law was changed again, back to the pre-1997 standard. There are a number of cases that arose between 1997 and 2006 in which a defendant who claimed justifiable use of force was judged to be guilty. Under rule 32/33, these guilty defendants may qualify for a post conviction relief petition, which allows a judge to review whether or not the defendant might have received a better outcome under the newer statutes.
A textbook case illustrating this situation is State of Arizona vs Rios, in which the defendant was judged guilty of second-degree murder for an act committed in 2005. The defendant claimed justifiable use of force. After his conviction, state law changed, and the defendant submitted an appeal and was granted a new trial, this time under the post-2006, more lenient self-defense laws.
If you or someone you know was involved in justifiable use of force case between 1997 and 2006, you may be able to file for a Rule 32/33 Petition of your conviction. Call our offices at (602) 307-0808 for your free consultation. You can also send us a confidential email here.
EXCELLENT Based on 391 reviews matt harrell2025-02-09Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Jason Karpel at DM assigned his team of David Campbell and Leah Dodd, which did an amazing job, being very attentive and making themselves available anytime we needed a conversation. This team worked out everything I needed and highly recommend this firm for anything !!! Thank you DM Cantor Team ! Paul Zellner2025-02-09Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great lawyers!!! Seb2025-02-07Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. The legal team at DM Cantor is absolutely phenomenal. They helped me win my case and made me feel at home throughout the whole process. I am extremely grateful I chose DM Cantor for legal help, and I cannot recommend them enough! Adam Flood2025-02-07Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Fantastic office, clean, and amazing artwork. Plus final boss sour! Kevin McDermott2025-02-01Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I worked with Nick Boca and Robyn McCraw. I felt I was in the best of hands from the beginning. They were clear and upfront at all times with their communication and instruction. Any divorce is a difficult time, and Nick and Robyn understand that. Their compassion for my situation and professionalism in how they handled my case stood out the most. I would highly recommend their services to anyone going through a difficult divorce. KM Peggy2025-01-30Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Cantor Law Group came as a recommendation from a family friend, and I am so grateful that this led me to speak with Nicholas Boca. Nik represented me in a complicated divorce which detailed a substantial claim of waste that spanned my 25-year marriage. He was very straightforward and honest and worked purposefully on my behalf at all times. He was empathetic to my situation and found ways to navigate difficult challenges unique to my case. Perhaps most importantly, he understood the importance of bringing closure to my situation and did his best to avoid unnecessary legal expenses. His methods to find resolution required wisdom and experienced practice of law. My heartfelt gratitude also extends to Robyn and Amanda. This was a team effort. Amanda’s knowledge of law, Robyn’s organizational skills and instinctive nature were invaluable. My “team” at Cantor Law Group cared. My case mattered, I mattered, my family mattered. From the front desk to the billing department, everyone handled my inquiries and needs without delay. Each person I interacted with seemed to know me personally and I felt reassured they were all working together to achieve the best possible outcome. Cantor Law Group has an excellent reputation amongst the experts. It was extremely reassuring knowing that the work ethic and professionalism of Cantor Law Group is respected by both the experts and the court. I would HIGHLY recommend Cantor Law group. Ayoub Abouri2025-01-30Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Met with Jason for a consultation. He was very honest and upfront. I appreciate the advice and information. I’m very happy I came in and even though I did not hire them I highly recommend them. Mike LaForest2025-01-17Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. All the attorneys are exceptional and they all work collaboratively on your case. While I worked closely with David, the other attorney's where always up to date and provided unparalleled guidance. Bottom line, they are a cut above and they deliver. You get what you pay for. If it matters, talk to DM Cantor.
Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.