State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 6867)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – In 2006, Mr. A was accused by two of his teenage grand-daughters of fondling them while in the swimming pool. We were able to show that the two girls were upset with their grandfather because he would not provide them with money because he was currently in a dispute with his own daughter (their mother). Upon further investigation, Mr. A passed a polygraph test and both alleged victims admitted that they had made up the story because they were upset, and because their mother had pressured them.

Mesa Police Department

March 24, 2006

March 24, 2006 By dmcantor 112 Other Vehicular Crimes Pre-Charge Victories, 115 Assault/Violent Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 15A Vehicular Homicide Victories, 19 Vehicular Homicides/Manslaughter Pre-Charge Victories, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 500 Assault / Violent Crime Victories, 63-65 Homicide Victories, 65 Homicide Pre-Charge Victories, 79F Second Degree Murder Victories, 79G Manslaughter Victories, 79K Negligent Homicide Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 6000)

NOT CHARGED | VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER – In 2004, Mr. P passed out while behind the wheel of his car, subsequently jumping a curb, striking and killing a 15-year-old boy walking home from high-school. In this high-profile case we were able to show that Mr. P blood sugar-level was at dangerously low levels at the time of the accident. In addition, we demonstrated that he had lost 105 pounds in the previous 120 days on the Atkins diet and that he was not under the influence of an Ambien sleeping pill which he had taken the night before.

Court – Mesa Police Department

December 2, 2005

December 2, 2005 By dmcantor 115 Assault/Violent Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 500 Assault / Violent Crime Victories, 66-68 Child/Vulnerable Adult Abuse Victories, 68 Child/Vulnerable Adult Pre-Charge Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Ms. W (DMC No. 4959)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD ABUSE – Ms. W was accused of child abuse by a local day care center after she had dropped her daughter off one morning. Because Ms. W had a previous conviction for child abuse, the police immediately arrested her. We were able to point out that Ms. W had gotten into a dispute with the day care center owner regarding unpaid bills and that a yelling match had ensued the morning that the owner called the police. Not only did Ms. W pass a polygraph, we also presented the Prosecutor with interviews of some of the day care center staff. She was not charged by the Prosecutor or by a Grand Jury.

Court – Maricopa County Superior Court

August 11, 2004

August 11, 2004 By dmcantor 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr B (DMC No. 4109)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL MISCONDUCT WITH MINOR / CHILD MOLESTATION – In 2001, Mr. B was accused by his adopted daughter of molesting her. We were able to show that the adopted daughter was using methamphetamine and was seeking to garner money out of Mr. B, while also siding with her mom in a custody dispute. By interviewing her older sister, we were able to show that she had made up the allegations, and the Prosecutor agreed to dismiss the most serious charges (which carried a mandatory minimum of 65 years in prison), and plead Mr. B to a Furnishing Harmful Materials to a Minor. He was subsequently placed on probation and did 2 days in jail

Maricopa County Superior Court No CR2003-XXXXXX

December 16, 2001

December 16, 2001 By dmcantor 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 1059)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL MISCONDUCT WITH A MINOR Mr. C was accused of molesting his infant daughter. He was going through a custody battle at the time, and we had him take and pass a polygraph examination. We also were able to show (through interviewing his ex-wife’s “friends”) that she had indicated she was going to make up these allegations in order to gain custody. She later refused to cooperate with the police when they sought to question her about her false allegations.

January 10, 2000

January 10, 2000 By dmcantor 10 Felony Aggravated DUI Pre-Charge Victories, 110 DUI, DUI Drugs, Extreme DWI & Super Extreme DWI Pre-Charge Victories, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, 906 Mesa DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Mesa City Court / Mesa Municipal Court Victories

State v. Mr. W (DMC No. 10168)

NOT CHARGED/DISMISSED | AGGRAVATED DUI NOT CHARGED/MISDEMEANOR DUI – State v. Mr. W. (DMC No. 10168) (Mesa City Court 2008-046536): Mr. w. was accused of taking a large U-Haul truck through a fast food drive thru and striking the roof. When police arrived, they contacted Mr. W. outside of his vehicle and he invoked his right to counsel. Mr. W. was unable to contact an attorney. The City Prosecutors Officer mistakenly accused Mr. W. of having a suspended driver license for a previous DUI. They then dismissed the misdemeanor in order to route the case for felony charges. Due to the fact that Mr. W. did not have a suspended license, the fact that he had problems reaching an attorney, and the fact that the State had trouble contacting the witness who was to place Mr. W. behind the wheel, no felony charges were ever brought against Mr. W., and the misdemeanor statute of limitations ran.

January 9, 2000

January 9, 2000 By dmcantor 116 Drug Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 4AA DUI Drugs Reduced, 600 Drug Crimes Victories, 82C Possession/Paraphernalia Pre-Charge Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, 908 Phoenix DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Phoenix City Court / Phoenix Municipal Court Victories

State v. Mr. L (DMC No. 4965)

NOT CHARGED/REDUCED | POSSESSION OF DANGEROUS DRUGS NOT CHARGED DUI/DRUGS (Meth) REDUCED to DUI alcohol – State v. Mr. L. (DMC No. 4965) (Phoenix City Court 3154717): Mr. L. was stopped at Indian School Road & 19^th Avenue for having an improper tag on his license plate. He subsequently was removed from the car and refused to do field sobriety tests or give a blood or breath test. While he was at the police station his wallet was searched and methamphetamine was found inside. He ultimately tried to leave a message for a lawyer, but nobody called him back. When blood was ultimately drawn, it revealed a .094 blood alcohol content and the presence of methamphetamine. Due to potential denial of right to counsel and stop issues, we were able to have the DUI drugs charged dismissed in exchange for a DUI alcohol, charge thereby sparing Mr. L. the 1 year license suspension.

January 1, 2000

January 1, 2000 By dmcantor 111 Felony Aggravated DUI Pre-Charge Victories, 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 9 Felony Aggravated DUI’s Reduced, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Carefree / Cave Creek Consolidated City Court Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. A. (DMC No. 6479)

NOT CHARGED/REDUCED | AGGRAVATED DUI (refusal) with CHILD in CAR NOT CHARGED/DUI MISDEMEANOR REDUCED to CRIMINAL SPEEDING – State v. Mr. A. (DMC No. 6479) (Carefree/Cave Creek Consolidated City Court CR2005-0030, TR2005-1412): Mr. A. was stopped travelling at Tom Darlington Road in Cave Creek, Arizona while he had three children in his car. Police were informed that Mr. A. had been drinking at Harold’s bar and became combative. He was ultimately arrested for DUI and was taken to the station where he requested a lawyer and refused to take any blood tests. We were able to convince the County Attorney’s Office not to charge Mr. A. with Aggravated DUI, and the City Attorney’s Office agreed to dismiss the DUI in exchange for a Criminal Speeding ticket.

Previous page 1 … 37 38 39

Our Location

Free Consultation