Our Location

40 N. Central Ave, Suite 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Free Consultation

(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 6552)

NOT CHARGED | 5 COUNTS SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR – State v. Mr. B. (DMC No. 6552) (Mesa Police Department Investigated): Mr. B. was a 21 year old young man who was dating a 16 year old girl. They slept together and she subsequently became pregnant. Her father was pushing the Mesa Police Department to file charges; however the young lady did not wish them to proceed. Mr. B. and the young lady worked out the issue of custody through the Family Law Court. The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office was informed of this new development and they declined to press the 5 counts of sexual conduct with a minor, which had been requested by the Detective.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 5360)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 5360) (Mesa Police Department Investigated): Mr. M. and his wife had adopted the alleged victim when she was 5 ½ years old. This was after she had been abandoned by her mother (twice) and put into foster homes. She was now a 17 year old teenager, and she had gotten a speeding ticket, a car accident and was exhibiting destructive behavior. Mr. M. required her to go to church, and just prior to going they engaged in a yelling match regarding her behavior. When she got to church, she made allegations to her elder that Mr. M. had molested her. Detectives conducted a “confrontation call” in which the alleged victim called Mr. M. in order to try and get him to confess to a crime. He denied all crimes, and agreed to meet her at a local Denny’s. He again denied all crimes, and at that point police arrested him. We began representing him, and showed the Detectives that this was all his adopted daughters manufactured allegations. In addition, his wife immediately filed an Order of Protection, cleared out their bank account and began a divorce proceeding. When all of this was presented to Detectives, and they agreed there was no probable cause to forward this to the County Attorney’s Office. No charges were brought against Mr. M.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38B Sexual Abuse Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 6559)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ABUSE – State v. Mr. C. (DMC No. 6559) (Phoenix Police Department Investigated): Mr. C. and his girlfriend had been living together for some while, when his girlfriend’s daughter told a psychiatrist that she had been fondled by Mr. C.  We were able to show that the alleged victim had behavioral problems, which included making false allegations against others, and that she had a mental disorder.  Also, her biological father was currently serving prison time in another State for allegedly abusing her.  Detectives determined that the alleged victim may have been making up this story in order to make Mr. C. move out of the house.  No charges were ever brought against Mr. C.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 37A Prostitution / Solicitation Pre-Charge Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 6705)

NOT CHARGED | SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 6705) (Scottsdale Police Department Investigated): Mr. M. was contacted by Detectives who were investigating a local massage parlor for alleged prostitution activities.  A “confidential informant” had given them Mr. M.’s information.  Mr. M. admitted to the violation, and then invoked his right to remain silent.  We contacted Detectives and worked out a “cooperation deal” in exchange for immunity.  No charges were brought against Mr. M.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 30-32 Indecent Exposure Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 32 Indecent Exposure Pre-Charge Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. L (DMC No. 6521)

NOT CHARGED | INDECENT EXPOSURE – State v. Mr. L. (DMC No. 6521) (Mesa Police Department Investigated): Mr. L. was at a local car wash waiting for his car to be finished, when he went into the bathroom in order to urinate.  When he came out, he was inside of the convenience store when the clerk called him over and told him that his “fly was down.”  Another customer had complained that she saw his penis sticking out of his pants.  Police were called, and Mr. L. denied that his penis was sticking out, or that he had intentionally exposed himself.  Detectives wanted to charge Mr. L. due to a prior indecent exposure arrest, but we were able to show that the lack of security cameras inside the convenience mart, along with the testimony of the convenience store clerk indicated that there was no intentional exposure.  No charges were brought against Mr. L.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38B Sexual Abuse Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 4465)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ASSAULT/SEXUAL ABUSE – State v. Mr. A. (DMC No. 4465) (Tempe Police Department Investigated): Mr. A. worked at a local convenience store (an AM/PM) in Tempe.  Police were called by a woman who claimed that she had gone into the store, and Mr. A. had pressed her against a wall, touched her breast and vaginal area.  We investigated and interviewed other witnesses who had been with the alleged victim after the incident.  She had failed to mention to them that she was sexually assaulted.  In addition, we were able to pull surveillance video from the AM/PM, which showed the alleged victim come in and began talking with Mr. A.  She also put her arms around him, hugged him and began kissing him.  After she purchased an 18 pack of beer, she began to walk out of the store in a swaggering and drunken manner.  When this information was provided to police, they attempted to re-interview the alleged victim, and she would not cooperate with police.  No charges were ever brought against Mr. A.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. H (DMC No. 6715)

NOT CHARGED | SEX ASSAULT NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 6715) (Tempe Police Department Investigated): Ms. H. was a Chinese immigrant who began a sexual relationship with a co-worker, who was also a Chinese immigrant.  After several dates and sexual encounters, Mr. H. indicated that he was not going to “leave his wife” for his co-worker.  She went and reported him to the HR Department, claiming she was sexually assaulted.  He was fired from the job, and she filed a lawsuit against the company for money.  We had Mr. H. take, and pass a polygraph.  Once a lawsuit was filed, the alleged victim no longer wished to criminally pursue Mr. H., as she was being “financially compensated” by the company.  No charges were ever brought against Mr. H., even though he was originally facing prison time.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. R (DMC No. 5979)

NOT CHARGED | SEX ASSAULT – State v. Mr. R.  (DMC No. 5979) (Phoenix Police Department Investigated): Mr. R. and his wife went dancing with a co-worker and her niece (the alleged victim) who was 19.  They had all drank alcohol, and then went back to the aunt’s house.  The alleged victim claimed that she was so drunk she could barely stand, and that Mr. R. had come into the room and engaged in sexual intercourse with her without consent.  A DNA analysis was conducted, and did not match Mr. R.  In addition, we were able to show that the alleged victims and her family were attempting to be paid $10, 000 in order to not go to police.  No charges were ever brought against Mr. R.  Originally, he was facing well over a decade in prison.

 

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 5222)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ASSAULT/SEX CONDUCT with a MINOR – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 5222) (Phoenix Police Department and Phoenix Union High School District Officials  Investigated): Mr. M. was a high school teacher who is mentoring a 15 year old female student.  She began emailing him relentlessly with statements such as “I want to runaway” and “my grandfather is oppressive”.  He attempted to distance himself from her, and then when she accused him of molesting her.  He was immediately suspended by the school district and an investigation ensued.  We were able to interview witnesses and show that the alleged victim had been stalking Mr. M.  We showed that she came up with fake allegations of breast cancer, and had pulled up his information on classmates.com, and had been cyber stalking Mr. M.  Although no charges were brought against Mr. M., he resigned from the school district and received a full severance.  He originally was facing potentially years in prison.

February 13, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 116 Drug Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 600 Drug Crimes Victories, 86B Cultivation of Marijuana Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. K (DMC No. 5293)

NOT CHARGED | CULTIVATION of MARIJUANA (6 plants) NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. K. (DMC No. 5293) (Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Investigated): Mr. K. lived at a property that had four separate structures, with multiple roommates.  Police executed a search warrant and found 6 marijuana plants (totaling 2 pounds) growing in one of the residents.  Mr. K. was arrested, and then contacted us.  We became involved with the Sherriff’s Office and showed detectives that Mr. K. was not involved in the marijuana cultivation.  No charges were ever brought against Mr. K.

 

1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 39
Call Now Button