NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION (2 counts) NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 5575) (Apache Junction Police Department Investigated): Mr. H. had four daughters.  The two youngest daughters were in high school and had become a perpetual problem for Mr. H. and Mrs. H.  They had accused him of various crimes (including sexual crimes) in the past, and those allegations were quickly shot down.  A new Detective came on board, and new allegations were made against Mr. H.  The Detective attempted a “confrontation call”, in which the alleged victims called Mr. H. and attempted to illicit a confession.  He denied all allegations.  We then had him submit to a polygraph test (in which he passed), we also offered Mr. H. to sit down for a “free talk” and a “voice stress test” with a Detective.  Although Mr. H. was facing potentially life in prison, no charges were brought against him.

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR (DCAC)/CHILD MOLESTATION (DCAC) | State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 4630) (Prescott Valley Police Department Investigated): Mr. M.’s 7 year old daughter was taken in by his wife to the doctor for a yeast infection.  The Doctor then advised the wife that he felt the 7 year old had been molested.  Mr. M.’s wife immediately got a Restraining Order and contacted police.  We were able to have Mr. M. take a polygraph test, in which he passed.  This all was submitted to the Prescott Valley Police Department Investigator, and no charges were brought against Mr. M.  During divorce proceedings, it was discovered that Mr. M.’s soon to be ex-wife may have manufactured allegations in order to gain an advantage regarding child custody.  Mr. M. was originally facing a minimum of 13 to 27 years in prison before we had these allegations shot down.

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 4624) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office Investigated): Mr. M.’s best friend had a 4 year old daughter, and they would come to Mr. M.’s house for picnic’s and BBQ’s.  Mr. M. was at one of these BBQ’s, when the 4 year olds mother accused him of improperly touching the 4 year old.  He denied these allegations and told the victim’s mom to call the cops and to go have her checked.  He did not have any contact with his best friend, best friend’s wife or the alleged victim for the next 2 years.  The Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office then appeared on his doorstep and began accusing him.  He retained our services, and we had him take a polygraph test and we spoke with Detectives.  No charges were ever brought regarding these false allegations.

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONUCT with a MINOR (DCAC)/CHILD MOLESTATION (DCAC) – State v. Mr. G. (DMC No. 10166) (Globe Police Department Investigated): Mr. G.’s step daughter was 38 years old when her and her new husband borrowed $45,000 from Mr. G. and his wife.  When they began to miss payments, he threatened to sue her for the balance.  She then made allegations that he had sex with her and molested her when she was a minor, and she reported this to police.  We sat down with Detectives and allowed them to conduct a “free talk” with Mr. G., and he also consented to a polygraph.  Not only did the Globe Police Department decline to route the case for charges, a lawsuit was also filed on Mr. G.’s behalf to recover the $45,000 that he was owed.

 

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR  –  State v. Mr. C. (DMC No. 11816) (Phoenix Police Department Investigated): Mr. C. was over 18 years old and had been dating his girlfriend who was under 18 while they were both in high school.  They had had sex numerous times over the course of several years when his girlfriend’s mother found her diary.  She found out they had sex when she was 14, 15, and 16, and she contacted police.  Although there were allegations that she was 14 years of age during some of the contacts, which would have exposed Mr. C. to 13 years minimum “day for day” prison for each sex act, we were able to convince the Detective and Prosecutor’s not to bring any charges.