January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, 902 Chandler DUI Wins, Case Victories, Chandler City Court / Chandler Municipal Court Victories, City Court Victories

State v. Mr. L. (DMC No.)

DISMISSED | DWI (Chandler Municipal Court No. 03-C-2047691CR): Mr. L. was involved in a single vehicle accident, and when police arrived he was found 200 yards away from his vehicle, walking. We filed a Corpus Delecti Motion, which the judge granted, and we were able to suppress all statements. Because of this motion, the State dismissed all charges.

Click the following link to find out more about DUI Defense in Chandler, AZ. To speak with a DUI lawyer now, call our offices 24 hours a day at (602) 307-0808.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, 906 Mesa DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Mesa City Court / Mesa Municipal Court Victories

State v. Mr. P. (DMC No.)

(Mesa Municipal Court No. 2003052360CR): Mr. P. was stopped for allegedly weaving, and he stated that he’d drunk two 16-oz. beers. Although he was 62 years old, he still performed fairly well on the Field Sobriety Tests. He provided a low blood BAC sample, and we were able to convince the prosecutor to dismiss the DUI charge.

January 7, 2000

State v. Mr. B. (DMC No.)

DISMISSED | DUI (Chandler Municipal Court No. 03-C-2215542CR): Mr. V. was involved in an alleged hit and run accident, and was under 21 years of age with alcohol in his system. He was subsequently stopped by police and provided a blood sample. Due to various problems identifying Mr. B. as the driver, we were able to convince the prosecutor to dismiss the DUI charge in Chandler and offer a plea of Minor Driving with Alcohol in Body.

If you would like to speak with a DUI lawyer, please give our offices a call at (602) 307-0808 or use our confidential email form.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, Case Victories, San Tan Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. G. (DMC No.)

(San Tan Justice Court No. 03-09845CR): Mr. G. was stopped by Gilbert Police for allegedly speeding. Upon contact, the officer claimed he had an odor of alcohol and was traveling at 80 mph in a 65 mph zone. Mr. G. submitted to a breath test, which resulted in a low BAC, yet the officer stated that he performed poorly on Field Sobriety Tests. Due to the facts of the case and our threat of trial, we were able to dismiss the prosecutor to dismiss the DUI charges.

Do you need a DUI attorney for San Tan Justice Court? If you want to speak with an attorney now, please give us a call at (602) 307-0808.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, Arrowhead Justice Court Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No.)

DISMISSED | DUI (Arrowhead Justice Court No. 02-08356CR): Mr. M. was stopped for traveling 96 mph on the freeway. Upon contact by the officer, he admitted to having some drinks, and told the officer he had “lower back problems.” He did not perform well on the Field Sobriety Tests, and was above the legal limit on his preliminary breath test (PBT). We were able to show that the officer changed the time on the traffic complaint regarding the traffic stop in order to move Mr. M’.s breath test to within 2 hours of the stop. Based on this and Mr. M.’s low blood alcohol reading, and we were able to convince the State to dismiss the DUI charges.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, Case Victories, East Mesa Justice Court Victories

State v. Mr. Z. (DMC No.)

(East Mesa Justice Court No. 03-06538CR): Mr. Z. was stopped for traveling 35 in a 50 mph zone. He was also weaving. When officers contacted him, they noted he was obese and he stated he had 3 beers. He also told the officers he had diabetes. We were able to point out that impairment the officer was witnessing was due to a blood sugar dip. Due to Mr. Z.’s condition, we were able to have the State dismiss the DUI charges.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, 908 Phoenix DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Phoenix City Court / Phoenix Municipal Court Victories

State v. Mr. K. (DMC No.)

(Phoenix Municipal Court No. 2966630CR): Ms. K. was stopped for driving 51 in a 40 mph zone. She admitted to having 2-3 beers, and submitted to Field Sobriety Tests. After she was transported to the police station, she provided a reading above the legal limit. We were able to point out that the calibration checks on the breath testing device showed that the machine was reading somewhat high. That, combined with her performance on Field Sobriety Tests allowed us to convince the prosecutor to dismiss the DUI.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, 908 Phoenix DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Phoenix City Court / Phoenix Municipal Court Victories

State v. Ms. J. (DMC No.)

(Phoenix Municipal Court No. 2970478CR): Ms. J. was seen by the side of the road as an officer was driving by. The officer indicated that the area had a high number of burglaries. When he pulled back around, he saw Ms. J. pulling away in her car and he stopped her. She performed well on Field Sobriety Tests, and provided a breath sample above the legal limit. Due to the questionable stop and her performance on FST’s, we were able to get the prosecutor to dismiss the DUI charge.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, 908 Phoenix DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Phoenix City Court / Phoenix Municipal Court Victories

State v. Ms. W. (DMC No.)

DISMISSED | DUI (Phoenix Municipal Court No. 2972842CR): Ms. W. was stopped for allegedly traveling 25 mph in a 40 mph zone. Although she did not perform well on Field Sobriety Tests, she was offered a breath test by the officer. The breath test resulted in an “interferent detected/no viable readings obtained.” We convinced the prosecutor that the reading would be suppressed, and the DUI was dismissed.

January 7, 2000

January 7, 2000 By dmcantor 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 3 DUI Dismissals, 909 Scottsdale DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Scottsdale City Court Victories

State v. Mr. T. (DMC No.)

(Scottsdale Municipal Court No. 1577232CR): Mr. T. was stopped by City of Scottsdale Police for an alleged wide right turn and a license plate light being out. We were able to explain that Mr. T.’s wide right turn was due to the fact that he had two female passengers in his car. In addition, he did quite well on Field Sobriety Tests. This resulted in his DUI being dismissed.

If you have a pending DUI case in Scottsdale, contact us immediately to speak with a Scottsdale DUI Lawyer about your case.

Previous page 1 … 47 48 49 50 51 … 56 Next page

Our Location

Free Consultation

State v. Mr. L. (DMC No.)

State v. Mr. P. (DMC No.)

State v. Mr. B. (DMC No.)

State v. Mr. G. (DMC No.)

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No.)

State v. Mr. Z. (DMC No.)

State v. Mr. K. (DMC No.)

State v. Ms. J. (DMC No.)

State v. Ms. W. (DMC No.)

State v. Mr. T. (DMC No.)