HIT and RUN REDUCED to SPEEDING TICKET – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 11173) (Phoenix City Court 4603008)
June 4, 2014
June 3, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 114 Theft and Fraud Pre-Charge Victories, 1900 Federal Court Victories, 400 Theft / Fraud Crime Victories, 47 Miscellaneous Theft/Fraud Victories, 47C Racketeering (RICO) / Illegally Conducting an Enterprise (Federal Charge) Victories, 47E Money Laundering (Federal Charge) Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories
NOT CHARGED | FEDERAL RICO/MONEY LAUNDERING and PROMOTION of GAMBLING NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 7850) (FBI Investigated): Mr. H. was involved in a running a company that served as a filter between internet users and an offshore gaming company. This was during the internet poker boom and internet poker gambling had not been legalized. FBI began investigating Mr. H.’s company for assisting 30 other companies in processing payment for various internet gamblers in the U.S. We were able to protect Mr. H.’s right, and prevented him from being charged with Federal RICO, Money Laundering and Promotion of Gambling charges.
June 3, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 114 Theft and Fraud Pre-Charge Victories, 400 Theft / Fraud Crime Victories, 43A Fraudulent Schemes Pre-Charge Victories, 46 Theft Pre-Charge Victories, 47B Racketeering (RICO) / Illegally Conducting an Enterprise (State Charge) Victories, 47M Insurance Fraud Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories
NOT CHARGED | STATE RICO, FRAUD SCHEMES, INSURANCE FRAUD and THEFT – State v. Ms. L. (DMC No. 6458) (Department of Insurance Fraud Unit DR05-00084/Arizona Attorney General’s Office Investigated): Ms. L. had filed several police reports alleging that several vehicles had been stolen, which were later found in the desert burned. Due to Ms. L.’s prior criminal history, the Department of Insurance Fraud Unit began investigating her, along with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office. It was suspected that she was running an illegal enterprise which involved faking the theft of vehicles in order to secure insurance proceeds. Although the Department of Insurance turned the case over to the Attorney General’s Office, we were able to convince them not to file charges against Ms. L. due to a lack of probable cause.
June 3, 2014
NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – State v. Mr. P. (DMC No. 8923) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office and Scottsdale Police Department Investigated): Mr. P. was involved in a particularly nasty divorce in which his ex-wife was seeking to get sole custody of their 4 year old son. She had made allegations that the 4 year old had claimed Mr. P. had touched his penis during bath time. We had a polygraph conducted on Mr. P. (in which he passed), and we also sat down with Scottsdale Police Department Detectives in which they conducted a polygraph. We were able to show through the prior divorce proceedings that Mr. P.’s ex-wife was particularly relentless. Due to the evidence we provided, no charges were brought against Mr. P. He was facing a minimum of 10 to 23 years in prison before we had the case shut down.
June 3, 2014
NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION (2 counts) NOT CHARGED – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 5575) (Apache Junction Police Department Investigated): Mr. H. had four daughters. The two youngest daughters were in high school and had become a perpetual problem for Mr. H. and Mrs. H. They had accused him of various crimes (including sexual crimes) in the past, and those allegations were quickly shot down. A new Detective came on board, and new allegations were made against Mr. H. The Detective attempted a “confrontation call”, in which the alleged victims called Mr. H. and attempted to illicit a confession. He denied all allegations. We then had him submit to a polygraph test (in which he passed), we also offered Mr. H. to sit down for a “free talk” and a “voice stress test” with a Detective. Although Mr. H. was facing potentially life in prison, no charges were brought against him.
June 3, 2014
NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR (DCAC)/CHILD MOLESTATION (DCAC) | State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 4630) (Prescott Valley Police Department Investigated): Mr. M.’s 7 year old daughter was taken in by his wife to the doctor for a yeast infection. The Doctor then advised the wife that he felt the 7 year old had been molested. Mr. M.’s wife immediately got a Restraining Order and contacted police. We were able to have Mr. M. take a polygraph test, in which he passed. This all was submitted to the Prescott Valley Police Department Investigator, and no charges were brought against Mr. M. During divorce proceedings, it was discovered that Mr. M.’s soon to be ex-wife may have manufactured allegations in order to gain an advantage regarding child custody. Mr. M. was originally facing a minimum of 13 to 27 years in prison before we had these allegations shot down.
June 3, 2014
NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 4624) (Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office Investigated): Mr. M.’s best friend had a 4 year old daughter, and they would come to Mr. M.’s house for picnic’s and BBQ’s. Mr. M. was at one of these BBQ’s, when the 4 year olds mother accused him of improperly touching the 4 year old. He denied these allegations and told the victim’s mom to call the cops and to go have her checked. He did not have any contact with his best friend, best friend’s wife or the alleged victim for the next 2 years. The Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office then appeared on his doorstep and began accusing him. He retained our services, and we had him take a polygraph test and we spoke with Detectives. No charges were ever brought regarding these false allegations.
June 3, 2014
NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONUCT with a MINOR (DCAC)/CHILD MOLESTATION (DCAC) – State v. Mr. G. (DMC No. 10166) (Globe Police Department Investigated): Mr. G.’s step daughter was 38 years old when her and her new husband borrowed $45,000 from Mr. G. and his wife. When they began to miss payments, he threatened to sue her for the balance. She then made allegations that he had sex with her and molested her when she was a minor, and she reported this to police. We sat down with Detectives and allowed them to conduct a “free talk” with Mr. G., and he also consented to a polygraph. Not only did the Globe Police Department decline to route the case for charges, a lawsuit was also filed on Mr. G.’s behalf to recover the $45,000 that he was owed.
June 3, 2014
REDUCED | SEUXAL CONDUCT with a MINOR (8 counts) REDUCED to class 6 open/misdemeanor with PROBATION and 4 MONTHS of JAIL – State v. Ms. L. (DMC No. 8960) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2008-171392): Ms. L. was a 26 year old female who had a consensual sexual relationship with a 16 year old female. The relationship had lasted several months, and it was disclosed to a counselor. She was eventually arrested and charged with 8 counts of Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and was facing 18 years in prison. We were able to have Ms. L. enrolled in counseling during the pendency of her case, and it was discovered that she herself had been molested at age 5 and 12 by other females. Through the process of “mitigation”, we were able to secure a class 6 open/misdemeanor offer which included probation and 4 months jail. After she completes probation, her case will be designated a misdemeanor.
June 3, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38 Miscellaneous Sex Crimes Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories
DISMISSED | SEXUAL CONDUCT with INMATE – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 5261) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2004-018591): Mr. H. was a prison guard at the Perryville woman’s prison. He was accused with having a sexual relationship with one of the inmates. He was eventually charged, and we were able to conduct a thorough investigation. During the investigation, we showed that the alleged victim had since been released, and rearrested and convicted on additional criminal charges. Due to the all of the issues in the case, the Prosecution dismissed all charges against Mr. H.