(602) 307-0808

Call Now, Open 24/7

Excellent Google Reviews, Best Criminal Defense Lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona

Misconduct Involving a Weapon in Arizona | A.R.S. §13-3102

Ranking Arizona Logo
Super Lawyers Logo
Avvo Logo
Table of Contents

Misconduct Involving a Weapon in Arizona | A.R.S. §13-3102

Whether in the Phoenix area, or anywhere in Arizona, per ARS §13-3102 “Misconduct Involving Weapons” can occur in numerous ways. Usually it occurs when a person carries a weapon without a permit (except a pocket knife); when they conceal a deadly weapon (without a permit); when they are “prohibited possessor” (i.e., a convicted felon who is prohibited from possessing a weapon); defacing a weapon (i.e., a “sawed off” shotgun) or possessing a weapon in a prohibited place (such as a school). This crime can also occur if you supply, sell, or provide a gun to a person if you know or have reason to know that person will use that gun during the commission of a felony. The most serious time that Misconduct Involving a Weapon is charged is when a gun is discharged at an occupied structure in order to assist, promote, or further the interests of a street gang, criminal syndicate, or racketeering enterprise (i.e., a “drive-by” but without a car).

Watch this short video where David explains Misconduct Involving a Weapon in Arizona:

Possible Punishment for Misconduct Involving a Weapon

Misconduct Involving a WeaponIf the Misconduct involves a “walk-by” shooting into an occupied structure, or selling or supplying a gun to another person if you know or have reason to know that person will use the gun in a commission of a felony or in furtherance of an act of terrorism, then this can be charged as a class three (3) felony.

For a first offense class three (3) felony, punishment can be:

  • Probation with zero (0) days in jail up to one (1) year in jail; or prison range of two (2) years to eight and three quarters (8.75) years in prison.
  • If the person has one (1) allegeable historical prior felony conviction then the “prison only” range is three and one half (3.5) years to sixteen and one quarter (16.25) years of incarceration.
  • If the person has two (2) allegeable historical prior felony convictions, then the “prison only” range is seven and one half (7.5) years to twenty-five (25) years of incarceration.

If the Misconduct involves the manufacturing or selling of prohibited weapons; prohibitive possessor; use of the weapon during the commission of certain types of felonies; or entering a nuclear hydroelectric generation station without permission while carrying a deadly weapon, then this can be charged as a class four (4) felony.

For a first offense class four (4) felony, punishment can be:

  • Probation with zero (0) days in jail up to one (1) year in jail; or prison of one (1) year to three and three quarters (3.75) years of incarceration.
  • If the person has one (1) allegeable historical felony prior conviction, then the “prison only” range is two and one quarter (2.25) years to seven and one half (7.5) years of incarceration.
  • If the person has two (2) allegeable historical prior felony convictions, then the “prison only” range is six (6) years to fifteen (15) years of incarceration.

If the Misconduct involves selling or transferring a deadly weapon to a prohibited possessor; or defacing a deadly weapon (i.e., a sawed-off shotgun); possessing a defaced weapon; or entering school grounds with a gun and being a member of a street gang, then this can be charged as a class six (6) felony.

For a first offense a class six (6) felony, punishment can be:

  • Probation with zero (0) days in jail up to one (1) year in jail; or prison of four (4) months to two (2) years of incarceration.
  • If the person has one (1) allegeable historical prior felony conviction, then the “prison only” range is nine (9) months to two and three quarters (2.75) years in prison.
  • If the person has two (2) allegeable historical prior felony convictions, then the “prison only” range is two and one quarter (2.25) to five and three quarters (5.75) years of incarceration.

If the Misconduct involves carrying a deadly weapon without a permit; carrying a concealed weapon without a Concealed Weapon permit; entering a public event or public establishment; carrying a deadly weapon after a reasonable request was made by a person of authority in the establishment to remove the weapon; or entering a polling place on election day with a deadly weapon, then these can be charged as a class one (1) misdemeanor.

The range of punishment for a class one (1) misdemeanor is probation with anywhere from zero (0) days in jail up to six (6) months in jail, and a fine of up to $2,500.00 plus an 80% surcharge.


Possible Defenses for Misconduct Involving a Weapon

Misconduct Involving a Weapon has numerous statutory defenses. For example, if you are a member of the military or law enforcement, many of these charges do not apply. In addition, if you have a holster which is carried on a belt and which is wholly or partially visible, then this is a defense to the charge. Also, it is a defense to carry a gun inside of your car, as long as it is not loaded and if you leave the vehicle the firearm cannot be visible from the outside of the car, and the car must be locked. Many times Officers will state that a gun in the glove box qualifies as carrying a concealed weapon. Sometimes they will be under the assumption that if you leave a gun in plain sight on the seat next to you while you are still in the car, that somehow this is a violation of the law. It is only a violation if you leave the vehicle and leave the gun in plain sight.

Other defenses include scenarios in which a prohibited possessor (i.e., a convicted felony) is given a package which contains a weapon without his knowledge (i.e., “Lack of Knowledge”). This can include driving an automobile in which there is a gun in a console or glove box without the prohibitive possessor’s knowledge. Because the mere possession of a weapon for a convicted felon carries such severe punishment, it is important to fully fight these charges. In addition, any conviction involving Misconduct with a Weapon can result in child custody repercussions should a person later go through a divorce. It is very important to fight these charges in order to prevent this type of “black mark” on one’s record.

The “Common Defenses” for Misconduct Involving a Weapon, which your Lawyer may apply in any criminal case are numerous and diverse. One of most common defenses we encounter is a “Miranda Rights Violation”. In Arizona, the standard of whether any inculpatory statement (i.e., a statement which tends to admit guilt) is admissible into evidence is based upon a “Voluntariness” standard. If we can demonstrate that the police coerced you (i.e., intimidated or tricked you) into making a confession or inculpatory statement, or that they did not properly read your Miranda Rights, then we can suppress those statements and any evidence gathered as a direct result of those statements. In addition, “Denial of right to Counsel” is another common defense which is often raised. This occurs when a suspect is in custody and requests to speak to their Attorney, but is denied and questioning continues.

Other defenses may include challenging the validity of any search warrant, or whether there were any “forensic flaws” during the investigation of your case. Depending on what you have been charged with, this could include exposing flawed procedures regarding blood, breath, and urine testing; fingerprints analysis; DNA testing; ballistics; gunshot residue testing; computer analysis/”cloning hard drive” procedures; forensic financial accounting reviews; etc. Lastly, one of the most common defenses is exposing sloppy or misleading police reports which include everything from misstatements, false statements, flawed photo line-ups and inaccurate crime scene reconstruction. It is important to hire a skilled Misconduct Involving a Weapon Lawyer to defend you who has knowledge of both the specific defenses and the common defenses involved in a Misconduct Involving a Weapon case.


Getting Help from Experienced Attorneys is Crucial

When charged with a crime of any sorts, it is paramount to hire a Specialist that is also AV® rated law firm (the highest possible rating by Martindale Hubbell®). David Michael Cantor is an Arizona Misconduct Lawyer and a Certified Criminal Law Specialist, per the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization. In addition, the Firm and all of its lawyers are listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers®. At DM Cantor, the majority of our Attorneys are ex-Prosecutors, and all of our Arizona Misconduct Lawyers know the system well. For a free initial consultation, call us at (602) 307-0808.

DM Cantor, Best Criminal Defense Lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona
Posted on Google Google
matt harrell profile picture
matt harrell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Jason Karpel at DM assigned his team of David Campbell and Leah Dodd, which did an amazing job, being very attentive and making themselves available anytime we needed a conversation. This team worked out everything I needed and highly recommend this firm for anything !!! Thank you DM Cantor Team !
Posted on Google Google
Paul Zellner profile picture
Paul Zellner
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great lawyers!!!
Posted on Google Google
Seb profile picture
Seb
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The legal team at DM Cantor is absolutely phenomenal. They helped me win my case and made me feel at home throughout the whole process. I am extremely grateful I chose DM Cantor for legal help, and I cannot recommend them enough!
Posted on Google Google
Adam Flood profile picture
Adam Flood
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Fantastic office, clean, and amazing artwork. Plus final boss sour!
Posted on Google Google
Kevin McDermott profile picture
Kevin McDermott
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I worked with Nick Boca and Robyn McCraw. I felt I was in the best of hands from the beginning. They were clear and upfront at all times with their communication and instruction. Any divorce is a difficult time, and Nick and Robyn understand that. Their compassion for my situation and professionalism in how they handled my case stood out the most. I would highly recommend their services to anyone going through a difficult divorce. KM
Posted on Google Google
Peggy profile picture
Peggy
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Cantor Law Group came as a recommendation from a family friend, and I am so grateful that this led me to speak with Nicholas Boca. Nik represented me in a complicated divorce which detailed a substantial claim of waste that spanned my 25-year marriage. He was very straightforward and honest and worked purposefully on my behalf at all times. He was empathetic to my situation and found ways to navigate difficult challenges unique to my case. Perhaps most importantly, he understood the importance of bringing closure to my situation and did his best to avoid unnecessary legal expenses. His methods to find resolution required wisdom and experienced practice of law. My heartfelt gratitude also extends to Robyn and Amanda. This was a team effort. Amanda’s knowledge of law, Robyn’s organizational skills and instinctive nature were invaluable. My “team” at Cantor Law Group cared. My case mattered, I mattered, my family mattered. From the front desk to the billing department, everyone handled my inquiries and needs without delay. Each person I interacted with seemed to know me personally and I felt reassured they were all working together to achieve the best possible outcome. Cantor Law Group has an excellent reputation amongst the experts. It was extremely reassuring knowing that the work ethic and professionalism of Cantor Law Group is respected by both the experts and the court. I would HIGHLY recommend Cantor Law group.
Posted on Google Google
Ayoub Abouri profile picture
Ayoub Abouri
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Met with Jason for a consultation. He was very honest and upfront. I appreciate the advice and information. I’m very happy I came in and even though I did not hire them I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Mike LaForest profile picture
Mike LaForest
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
All the attorneys are exceptional and they all work collaboratively on your case. While I worked closely with David, the other attorney's where always up to date and provided unparalleled guidance. Bottom line, they are a cut above and they deliver. You get what you pay for. If it matters, talk to DM Cantor.
Free Initial Consultation
Open 24/7
Free Initial Consultation

Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success

Call Now Button