Surreptitious Recording Victories
“Victories” Definition: DM Cantor defines a “Victory” as a Complete Acquittal at Jury/Bench Trial; cases Dismissed after they were set for Jury/Bench Trial; cases Dismissed prior to being set for Jury/Bench Trial; Pre-Charge/Pre-Indictment cases where DM Cantor Prevented Charges from being filed; a Partial Acquittal at Jury/Bench Trial; cases in which Charges were Substantially Reduced; and cases where Prison/Jail exposure or Civil Repercussions were Substantially Reduced.
Disclaimer – Results depend upon factors unique to each case and that results in one case do not predict similar results in others.
Not Charged | (7 Counts) Surreptitious Videotaping and (7 Counts) Felony Voyeurism
SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX4)
Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault and Felony Surreptitious Recording
PIMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX4); TOHONO O’ODHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED (DR NO. 20XX-XXXXXX4); PIMA COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TURNED DOWN PROSECUTION
Not Charged | Felony Voyeurism, Felony Surreptitious Videotaping & Felony Sexual Exploitation of a Minor
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (CASE NO. CR2007-180326, CR2008-104879)
Not Charged | Felony Voyeurism & Felony Surreptitious Viewing
Payson Police Department Investigated (DR No. 20XX-XXXXXXX2) & Gila County Attorney’s Office Investigated
Not Charged | Felony Sexual Assault and Felony Surreptitious Video Taping | State v. Mr. T
TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR2014-13XXXX) (DMC NO. 14041)
Not Charged | Felony Surreptitious Video Taping
SURPRISE POLICE DEPARTMENT (CASE NO. DR13-090XXXX)
Reduced to Attempt with Probation and Zero Days in Jail | (2 Counts) Felony Surreptitious Videotaping
Maricopa County Superior Court (Case No. CR2012-155463)
Reduced | Felony Surreptitious Photographing
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (CASE NO. CR2004-010581)