INJUNCTION AGAINST HARASSMENT DISMISSED – State v. Mr. P. (DMC No. 4651) (Gilbert City Court 04CR966/97): Mr. P. had been locked in a particularly difficult divorce when his wife filed

State v. Ms. C (DMC No. 6282)

ORDER of PROTECTION DISMISSED after HEARING – State v. Ms. C. (DMC No. 6282) (Maricopa County Superior Court FN2006-019301/FN2006-002312): Ms. C. had been in a long standing feud with her

State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 6776)

INJUNCTION AGAINST HARASSMENT QUASHED after HEARING – State v. Mr. A. (DMC No. 6776) (Maricopa County Juvenile Court JP278): Mr. A. (a juvenile) and his sister were being harassed by other

State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 4533)

ORDER of PROTECTION QUASHED at HEARING – State v. Mr. A. (DMC No. 4533) (Chandler City Court 04-C-DV290): Mr. A. was having marital problems with his wife when she filed

State v. Mr. B (DMC No. 4802)

VIOLATION of INJUNCTION AGAINST HARASSMENT DISMISSED- State v. Mr. B. (DMC No. 4802) (Scottsdale City Court CR2004-20751): Mr. B. had been having problems with his mother, who she had served

State v. Ms. C (DMC No. 6470)

INJUNCTION AGAINST HARASSMENT DISMISSED at HEARING – State v. Ms. C. (DMC No. 6470) (Maricopa County Superior Court CV2006-008805): Ms. C. lived in her mother’s condo, and she had a

State v. Mr. P. (DMC No. 4651)

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success