Our Location

40 N. Central Ave, Suite 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Free Consultation

(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 4A DUI Drugs Dismissals, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Glendale City Court Victories

State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 7291)

DISMISSED | DUI DRUGS (Methamphetamine) – State v. Mr. H. (DMC No. 7291) (Glendale City Court No. TR06-26138): Mr. H. was involved in a single vehicle accident in which he struck a power pole in the City of Glendale. Paramedics had to forcibly remove him from the vehicle, and the officer assisted in holding him down while he was strapped to a back board and taken to the hospital. Although the officer observed no signs and symptoms of alcohol or drug impairment, he still requested a blood test from Mr. H. We filed a Motion to Suppress the results of the blood test due to a lack of Probable Cause to Invoke the Implied Consent Law. Although Mr. H. had a prior DUI, was currently on probation for a felony drug charge and had Methamphetamine in his blood test, the Judge still agreed with our motion and after an Evidentiary Hearing suppressed the result of his blood test. The Prosecution then moved to Dismiss All Charges.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 200 DUI / Vehicular Crime Victories, 4A DUI Drugs Dismissals, 903 Gilbert DUI Wins, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Gilbert City Court / Gilbert Municipal Court Victories

State v. Ms. T. (DMC No.)

DISMISSED | DUI DRUGS (Gilbert Municipal Court No. 06-TR25326DU): Ms. T. was stopped in the city of Gilbert for allegedly having a rear taillight and brakelight out on her vehicle. Upon contact with her, the officer claimed she had a yellowish coating on her tongue, along with some other signs and symptoms of drug impairment. A Drug Recognition Evaluation (DRE) was conducted and police came to the opinion that she was under the influence of cannabis and central nervous system depressants. Her results came back with the drug Citalopram in her system. We were able to show that she had a prescription for this drug, and that the drug was not impairing her ability to drive at the time police stopped her. Ultimately we convinced the prosecutor to dismiss all charges.

For information about Gilbert, AZ DUI Defense, click here. If you would like to speak with a lawyer now, call us at (602) 307-0808. Our phones are answered 24 hours a day and you can use our confidential email form as well.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2100 Superior Court Victories, 23 Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct With Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 5192)

REDUCED | 3 COUNTS of SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR REDUCED to ATTEMPT with PROBATION and CREDIT for TIME ALREADY SERVED in JAIL – State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 5192) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2003-039798): Mr. S. was 19 years old and was on the internet to meet girls.  The alleged victim claimed she was 17, when in reality she was 13.  He met up with her at his apartment and had sexual conduct with her on three separate occasions.  Due to the alleged victim’s age, it was irrelevant that she represented herself to be 17 for purposes of the charge.  However, we used her misrepresentation for mitigation.  We became involved in the case after Mr. S. had already spent approximately a year in custody.  We were able to resolve the charge to an “attempt” with probation and credit for time already served.  Mr. S. was originally looking at a minimum of 39 years in prison (day for day) with the maximum of 81 years. He was released at sentencing.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2000 Juvenile Court Victories, 23 Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct With Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 6317)

REDUCED | 2 COUNTS of SEXUAL CONDUCT with a MINOR/1 COUNT of CHILD MOLEST REDUCED to INDECENT EXPOSURE a CLASS 6 OPEN/MISDEMEANOR with 60 DAYS of DEFERRED JAIL – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 6317) (Maricopa County Juvenile Court JV-541104): Mr. M. was an 11 year old juvenile who attended a local daycare center after school.  He was accused of engaging in sex acts with other young boys at the school.  We were able to convince the Prosecutor to keep the offense at Juvenile Court (rather than Adult Court), and to reduce the charge down to an “indecent exposure” with deferred jail that would be deleted upon completion of counseling.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2100 Superior Court Victories, 23 Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct With Minor Reduced, 300 Sex Crime Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 6362)

REDUCED | 3 COUNTS of SEX CONDUCT with a MINOR (dangerous crimes against children) REDUCED to ATTEMPT with 5 YEARS in PRISON – State v. Mr. S. (DMC No. 6362) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2006-030204): Mr. S. was a 20 year old male who lived in his own apartment.  He had befriended a 13 year old girl, who had run away from home.  She ended up staying at his apartment for the previous 2 days before, police were called.  When they interviewed her, she admitted to having three sex acts with Mr. S. in the prior 3 weeks.  He was ultimately interviewed and confessed.  He was facing a minimum of 39 years in prison, with a maximum of 81 years.  We were able to present mitigation and have the State reduce the offer to an “attempt” with probation and 5 years in prison (with credit for the 7 months he had spent in jail during the pendency of the case).

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38B Sexual Abuse Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 6559)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ABUSE – State v. Mr. C. (DMC No. 6559) (Phoenix Police Department Investigated): Mr. C. and his girlfriend had been living together for some while, when his girlfriend’s daughter told a psychiatrist that she had been fondled by Mr. C.  We were able to show that the alleged victim had behavioral problems, which included making false allegations against others, and that she had a mental disorder.  Also, her biological father was currently serving prison time in another State for allegedly abusing her.  Detectives determined that the alleged victim may have been making up this story in order to make Mr. C. move out of the house.  No charges were ever brought against Mr. C.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 300 Sex Crime Victories, 37 Prostitution / Solicitation Reduced, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Mesa City Court / Mesa Municipal Court Victories

State v. Ms. J. (DMC No. 5977)

REDUCED | PROSTITUTION – State v. Ms. J. (DMC No. 5977) (Mesa City Court 2005-067109): REDUCED to FALSE INFORMATION to a POLICE OFFICER with ZERO DAYS in JAIL  Ms. J. was with another woman, when they were observed by undercover Detectives getting into a gentleman’s pickup truck.  The truck was pulled over and all occupants were questioned.  Ms. J. and her female companion denied being prostitutes; however, they gave false information as to their names and whether they possessed ID.  We were able to show that there was no corroborating evidence that she had actually made an offer of sex in exchange for money, and the State agreed to dismiss the prostitution charge in exchange for a plea to the “false information” charge.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 300 Sex Crime Victories, 36 Prostitution / Solicitation Dismissals, Case Victories, City Court Victories, Mesa City Court / Mesa Municipal Court Victories

State v. Mr. D. (DMC No. 6205)

DISMISSED | SOLICITATION of PROSTITUTION – State v. Mr. D. (DMC No. 6205) (Mesa City Court 2006-004348): Undercover Mesa Detectives were monitoring an area near Alma School & Main for alleged prostitution activity.  A female prostitute was recognized getting into Mr. D.’s car, and both were pulled over and cited.  In exchange for Mr. D.’s cooperation, he was granted immunity in order for the State to prosecute the alleged prostitute.  All charges against Mr. D. were dropped.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 37A Prostitution / Solicitation Pre-Charge Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 6705)

NOT CHARGED | SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION – State v. Mr. M. (DMC No. 6705) (Scottsdale Police Department Investigated): Mr. M. was contacted by Detectives who were investigating a local massage parlor for alleged prostitution activities.  A “confidential informant” had given them Mr. M.’s information.  Mr. M. admitted to the violation, and then invoked his right to remain silent.  We contacted Detectives and worked out a “cooperation deal” in exchange for immunity.  No charges were brought against Mr. M.

February 19, 2014
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 2100 Superior Court Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 33-35 Public Sexual Indecency Victories, 34 Public Sexual Indecency Reduced, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr. G (DMC No. 6217)

REDUCED | 2 COUNTS of FELONY PUBLIC SEXUAL INDECENCY to a MINOR REDUCED to a ATTEMPTED CLASS 6 OPEN/MISDEMEANOR with PROBATION and 60 DAYS in JAIL – State v. Mr. G. (DMC No. 6217) (Maricopa County Superior Court CR2005-034831): Mr. G. was accused of being at a factory outlet mall when he allegedly exposed and touched himself in front of 2 minor children and their mother.  He was subsequently arrested, and admitted that he had touched himself through the outside layer of his clothes.  He eventually went into counseling and voluntarily underwent a surgical procedure for castration, in order to curb his inappropriate sexual desires.  Due to the lengths that Mr. G., was going through, to address his issues, the State offered a probation deal.  Although Mr. G. had 2 prior misdemeanor convictions for similar offenses, the Judge chose not to give him the maximum 1 year in jail (under the plea) but instead he was sentenced to only 60 day with probation and counseling.

1 … 64 65 66 67 68 … 156
Call Now Button