State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 6477)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD PORNOGRAPHY (Gilbert Police Department Investigated) Mr. T. was at a local Walgreens pharmacy picking up film from his 5-year-old daughter’s birthday party when police showed up and took him in for questioning. It had turned out that another child had obtained one of the many disposable cameras available to the children at the party and had taken photos of Mr. T’s daughter’s private parts. By reconstructing the height of the photographer and the angle of the camera (which showed the photographer was 3-feet tall), we were able to prove that another child had taken the photos and not Mr T. He went from facing a mandatory minimum 30 years in prison to not being charged at all.

Gilbert Police Department

April 27, 2008

April 27, 2008 By dmcantor 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 24-25A Child Pornography Victories, 25A Child Pornography Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State vs. Mr. L (DMC No. 9999)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF A MINOR (Child Pornography) State vs. Mr. L. (DMC No. 9999) (Chandler Police Department): Police showed up at Mr. L.’s house and asked to search his computer due to allegations of alleged Child Pornography. When he refused, they told him that they would get a search warrant and come back and lock down his house. He then agreed and his computer was taken and searched. Police allegedly had found numerous images of simulated and possibly real child pornography on his computer. Due to the issues of a potentially illegal search under the case of Bumper vs. North Carolina, we were able to convince the detectives to not file charges. Mr. L. was facing a potential minimum of over 100 years in prison if he were convicted.

March 9, 2007

March 9, 2007 By dmcantor 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. M (DMC No. 6881)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ASSAULT – In 2006, Mr. M, a juvenile correctional officer, was accused of molesting one of the inmates. We had Mr. M pass a polygraph, and the inmate refused to do the same when requested to do so by Detectives. It was fairly easy to show that this was a retaliatory claim by an inmate against one of his jailers. He was not charged by the Prosecutor or by a Grand Jury.

Court – Pinal County Sheriff’s Office

February 28, 2007

February 28, 2007 By dmcantor 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. A (DMC No. 6867)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – In 2006, Mr. A was accused by two of his teenage grand-daughters of fondling them while in the swimming pool. We were able to show that the two girls were upset with their grandfather because he would not provide them with money because he was currently in a dispute with his own daughter (their mother). Upon further investigation, Mr. A passed a polygraph test and both alleged victims admitted that they had made up the story because they were upset, and because their mother had pressured them.

Mesa Police Department

August 11, 2004

August 11, 2004 By dmcantor 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories, Maricopa County Superior Court Victories

State v. Mr B (DMC No. 4109)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL MISCONDUCT WITH MINOR / CHILD MOLESTATION – In 2001, Mr. B was accused by his adopted daughter of molesting her. We were able to show that the adopted daughter was using methamphetamine and was seeking to garner money out of Mr. B, while also siding with her mom in a custody dispute. By interviewing her older sister, we were able to show that she had made up the allegations, and the Prosecutor agreed to dismiss the most serious charges (which carried a mandatory minimum of 65 years in prison), and plead Mr. B to a Furnishing Harmful Materials to a Minor. He was subsequently placed on probation and did 2 days in jail

Maricopa County Superior Court No CR2003-XXXXXX

December 16, 2001

December 16, 2001 By dmcantor 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. C (DMC No. 1059)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL MISCONDUCT WITH A MINOR Mr. C was accused of molesting his infant daughter. He was going through a custody battle at the time, and we had him take and pass a polygraph examination. We also were able to show (through interviewing his ex-wife’s “friends”) that she had indicated she was going to make up these allegations in order to gain custody. She later refused to cooperate with the police when they sought to question her about her false allegations.

Previous page 1 2 3 4

Our Location

Free Consultation