Our Location

40 N. Central Ave, Suite 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Free Consultation

(602) 307-0808
Call Now, Open 24/7
November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. L (DMC No. 1466)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION (DMC No. 1466) State v. Mr. L.: Mr. L. was having problems with his wife and his mother in law. In the past, the mother in law had accused him of molesting his daughter when she was 3 years old. The daughter was now 8 years old and was known to frequently tell lies. The daughter now claimed that Mr. L. had had anal sex with her 50 plus times. Upon a forensic medical exam, only 1 small anal fissure was found. We brought in a doctor who reviewed the findings and stated this was consistent with merely a “hard stool” and in no way amounted to evidence of anal rape. C.P.S. was brought in, and they interviewed the family the girl was now staying with. The family stated the girl would constantly tell lies and make up fantastical stories. As far as her knowledge of certain sex acts, it was discovered that her babysitter’s brother was a registered sex offender and had been discussing the sex acts with all the children the babysitter brought over. In the end, we met with the Pinal County Attorney and they decided to not charge Mr. L., protecting him from facing life in prison. However, they did begin an investigation into the babysitter’s brother, who was a registered sex offender.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 21 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 24-25A Child Pornography Victories, 25A Child Pornography Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 1472)

NOT CHARGED | POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY (DMC No. 1472) State v. Mr. S.: Mr. S. had taken some photographs of his male acquaintances, who were 21 and 23 years old. When the photos were developed, the Walgreens employees notified police. A Detective thought the people in the photos may be under 18 years of age. We made contact with the detective, informed her of the ages of the 2 male acquaintances, and also pointed out that under the scientific matrixes used to identify the ages of people in photographs; this wasn’t even a close call. The Detective agreed to not to file charges and stated she would be destroying the photos. We indicated she could not destroy the photos as 1) they were evidence and, 2) our client had done nothing wrong. The photographs were returned to our client, and no charges were filed.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 1481)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ASSAULT (DMC No. 1481): Mr. S. had met a girl at his apartment complex, and they had 6-7 beers while at his house. They eventually had consensual sex on the couch, and when Mr. S. informed her he was tired and would be going to sleep so she should leave, she stated, “Why do all the guys want me for sex only?” She then left his apartment crying, and ran into Mr. S.’s roommate by the pool. She told the roommate she had been coerced into having sex, and she contacted police. We were able to meet with Detectives and explain the situation. In addition, we asked them to give the young woman a polygraph, at which time she became nervous and stated she no longer wanted to cooperate with the police. We were able to convince the Detective of false reporting and to not file charges of sexual assault, protecting Mr. S. from facing decades in prison.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. O (DMC No. 1597)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ASSAULT (DMC No. 1597) State v. Mr. O: Mr. O. had a neighbor who he had kissed approximately 5-10 times in the past 6 months. This neighbor was married, and her husband found out about it. The neighbor then claimed it had only happened once, and that he had “attacked” her. Before we met with Detectives, we had Mr. O. take and pass a polygraph examination. We then met with the Detective and offered to have Mr. O. take their polygraph and voice stress analysis tests. The Detective was not interested, and forwarded the case to the County Attorney’s Office for charging. Upon review by the County Attorney’s Office and upon meeting with us, they cleared the case exceptionally and “turned down” prosecution.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. J (DMC No. 1882)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION – State v. Mr. J. (DMC No. 1882)

Mr. J. had gone through a divorce with his wife, and had visitation with his 14 year old daughter, who was mildly retarded. After the daughter went home, his ex-wife called C.P.S. and reported that Mr. J. had been molesting her. When the daughter was interviewed, she stated that she had been touched, then said it was an accident. She went back and forth between the 2 stories. We met with Detectives and C.P.S. workers and were able to convince the Detectives to not file charges. However, in an abundance of caution, C.P.S. “substantiated” the charges, and this caused Mr. J. to lose his visitation rights. That being said, he was facing the rest of his life in prison and charges were not filed. When his daughter turned 18, they reconnected their relationship and she later admitted she had been pressured by her mother to make up these allegations.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. T (DMC No. 2066)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION (DMC No. 2066) State v. Mr. T.: Mr. T. and his family belonged to a nudist club in Apache Junction. Neighbors began to have concerns about his children and called C.P.S. The children were interviewed by C.P.S., who all denied being molested. We personally interviewed 2 of the kids, who denied ever being molested by their father. In the end, C.P.S. “unsubstantiated” the allegations, and we convinced the Detective not to file charges, protecting Mr. T. from facing decades in prison.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 2650)

NOT CHARGED | CHILD MOLESTATION (DMC No. 2650): Mr. S. was divorcing his wife after only 15 months of marriage. During the divorce, the biological father of the wife’s 3 year old daughter accused Mr. S. of molesting his daughter. When the charges were made, the girl also made allegations against her biological father. We had Mr. S. submit to a polygraph, which he passed. When we sat down with Detectives, we provided our polygraph results and also had our client consent to a police polygraph. We were able to convince the Detective to decline filing charges, protecting Mr. S. from facing life in prison.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 38C Furnishing Harmful or Obscene Materials to a Minor, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. S (DMC No. 2967)

NOT CHARGED | FURNISHING PORNOGRAPHY TO A MINOR (DMC No. 2967) State v. Mr. S.: Mr. S. was having a BBQ at his house with a woman he used to date. Various 10 year old boys were also at the BBQ. As he was pulling up a video game site for the kids, some photos came up from pornographic websites. The woman saw this, and reported it to the police approximately 2 months later, after their relationship had fallen apart. We were able to sit down with the Detective and explain this was inadvertent on our client’s part. In addition, we spoke with the prosecutor at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, who agreed to “turn down” the charges. Mr. S.’s computer was then returned to him from police evidence. Had Mr. S. been charged with these allegations, he would have faced lifetime registration as a sex offender.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 29A Sexual Assault Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. D (DMC No. 3041)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL ASSAULT (DMC No. 3041) State v. Mr. D.: Mr. D. was at a local nightclub in the V.I.P. room when he met the alleged victim. Mr. D. had been drinking with her and another girl, and all 3 were kissing. The alleged victim went home with him, and they engaged in consensual sexual activity. The next morning she gave him her work schedule, they made another date, and he drove her home. By that night, she called Detectives and claimed she had been drugged and raped. We had the alleged victim’s blood sample analyzed, which showed no drugs in her system. We also retrieved photos which had been taken that night at the bar, which showed the alleged victim to be perfectly lucid. Lastly, we sat down with Detectives with Mr. D. and he passed a police polygraph. We were able to convince the Detective to not file charges, protecting Mr. D. from spending decades in prison.

November 17, 2011
Posted on Author By dmcantor Categories 113 Sex Crime Pre-Charge Victories, 23A Child Molestation/Sexual Conduct with a Minor Pre-Charge Victories, 300 Sex Crime Victories, 900 Pre-Charge Case Victories, Case Victories

State v. Mr. P (DMC No. 3500)

NOT CHARGED | SEXUAL CONDUCT WITH A MINOR (DMC No. 3500) State v. Mr. P.: Mr. P.’s niece was 14 years old and had come to live with him and his wife. She was sent to their house because she was having sex with different boys. In addition, the girl’s mother was on drugs and had signed custody of the children over to them 2 other times. The grandmother now had custody of the children. The mother claimed the girl (now 16) had told her she’d been having sex for 2 years with Mr. P. She then asked to borrow money. When she was not loaned money, she then contacted the police. We were able to speak with the Maricopa County Attorney, and got the reviewing prosecutor to “turn down” charges, as both mother and daughter had criminal histories and were making these accusations in order to extort money.

1 … 122 123 124 125 126 … 156
Call Now Button