Click Here for Free Consultation

Drive By Shooting

Whether in the Phoenix area, or anywhere in Arizona, per A.R.S. §13-1209 “Drive-By Shooting” occurs when a person intentionally discharges a firearm from a motor vehicle at a person, other occupied motor vehicle, or an occupied structure. Need Criminal Defense Attorneys in Arizona? Contact David Michael Cantor if you have been charged with a Drive-By Shooting. Call Us 24/7 by phone 602-307-0808 for a Free Consultation.

This is similar to Misconduct Involving a Weapon, per A.R.S. §13-3102, and per A.R.S. §13-3107 “Unlawful Discharge of a Firearm,” except that an automobile is involved. As your lawyers, we would attempt to use these alternate statutes as bargaining tools in order to convince the prosecutor to charge you with a lesser offense that carries a less severe punishment.

Click Here to See Our Misconduct Involving
Weapons Case Victories

If You Have Been the Victim of a Violent Crime – Click Here

Possible Punishment for Drive-By Shooting

Drive-by Shooting is charged as a class two (2) felony with an “Allegation of Dangerousness.” The reason it is a “dangerous” offense is because there is dangerous instrument or deadly weapon (i.e., a gun) involved in the commission of the offense. A first-offense dangerous class two (2) felony involves mandatory “prison only” sentence of seven (7) years minimum, ten and one half (10.5) years presumptive, and twenty-one (21) years maximum of incarceration. If a person has one (1) allegeable historical prior dangerous felony conviction, then the range of “prison only” is fourteen (14) years minimum, fifteen and three quarters (15.75) years presumptive, and twenty-eight (28) years maximum of incarceration. If the person has two (2) allegeable historical prior dangerous felony convictions, then the “prison only” mandatory minimum punishment is twenty-one (21) years, the presumptive is twenty-eight (28) years, and the maximum is thirty-five (35) years of incarceration.

Get a Free Case Review – Click Here

Possible Defenses for Drive-By Shooting

The strongest defense to a charge of Drive-By Shooting is misidentification of the defendant; the crime might have been committed, but the defendant was not the one who committed the crime. Many times the police will pull over a vehicle suspected of involvement in a Drive-By Shooting, and there will be multiple occupants in that vehicle. The police usually do not know which of the people in the car actually fired the weapon; any weapon in the car, if found, is usually not on the person of any of the suspects. Thus, the police will try to find out which of the persons fired the gun by asking witnesses who were present at the scene of the drive-by to identify who shot the gun. This poses many problems and many innocent defendants are convicted because of flawed identification procedures. Usually, any witnesses who were at the shooting scene were so panicked by the gunfire that they would not be able to positively make an identification of the alleged shooters. Additionally, the police will conduct what is known as a “show-up” identification instead of a proper “line-up” identification. A “show-up” is when the police drive an individual suspect (usually in handcuffs), back to the scene of the crime and then have witnesses at the scene indicate whether that was the person who fired the gun or not. The problem is that this form of identification procedure is unduly suggestive and extremely unreliable. From the witnesses perspective, they are already pre-disposed to think this is the person who they saw commit the crime because why else would somebody be there, in handcuffs, with police officers standing next to them, unless the police had reason to believe that this was the person who committed the crime? It is very important to suppress the identification procedures and to veraciously cross-examine any eye-witnesses in court on their ability to see the defendant, their memory, and any alleged statements they made to the police following the incident.

It is also imperative to challenge any claim of “gunshot residue” being left behind on the alleged “shooter’s” hands. Many times a gun will be fired by one individual, but then handed to another individual. The three (3) elements of gunshot residue (barium, antimony, and lead) will also be left behind on that person’s hands. It then becomes virtually impossible to distinguish who actually fired the weapon. It is important to utilize the proper forensic experts to attack the State’s evidence.

Additionally, because our law firm fights conviction from all angles, we would assert a wide range of defenses and challenges to constitutional violations that apply in all criminal cases. The possibilities are numerous and diverse. One of those we frequently assert is a “Miranda rights violation.” In Arizona, the standard of whether any incriminating statement (i.e., a statement which tends to admit guilt) is admissible into evidence is based upon a “voluntariness” standard. If we can demonstrate that the police coerced you (i.e., intimidated or tricked you) into making a confession or inculpatory statement, or that they did not properly read you your Miranda Rights, then we can suppress those statements and any evidence gathered as a direct result of those statements. In addition, the “denial of right to Counsel” is another common defense which is often raised. This occurs when a suspect is in custody and requests to speak to their attorney, but is denied and questioning continues. Other defenses may include challenging the validity of any search warrant, or whether there were any “forensic flaws” during the investigation of your case. Depending on what else you have been charged with, this could include exposing flawed procedures regarding blood, breath, and urine testing; fingerprints analysis; DNA testing; ballistics; gunshot residue testing; computer analysis/cloning hard drive procedures; forensic financial accounting reviews; etc.. Lastly, one of the most common defense tactics is exposing sloppy or misleading police reports which include everything from misstatements, false statements, flawed photo line-ups and inaccurate crime scene reconstruction. It is important to hire a skilled Drive-By Shooting lawyer to defend you who has knowledge of all the possible defenses to assert in your case.

If you have not been charged with
Drive-by Shooting yet, but are in the
“pre-charge investigation stage” – Click Here Now

It is important to hire an AV® rated law firm (the highest possible rating by Martindale Hubbell®). Also David Michael Cantor is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Arizona and a Certified Criminal Law Specialist, per the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization. In addition, the Firm and all of its lawyers are listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers®. At the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., the majority of our Attorneys are ex-Prosecutors, and all of our Criminal Defense Attorneys in Arizona know the system well. For a Free Initial Consultation, call us at 602-307-0808.

Click Here… If you have been charged with
“Misconduct Involving a Weapon” and no automobile
was involved in your case.

Contact The Law Offices of David Michael Cantor and speak to Criminal Defense Attorneys in Arizona. We will assist you with your Drive-By Shooting case.

Click to Watch Important Questions to Ask when Hiring a Lawyer

Request a Free Consultation

Fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

Click here for important legal disclaimer.


10.0 Superb Rating
AVVO Criminal Defense

AV-Highest Rated Preeminent Lawyers

Nation's Top 1% Attorney
National Association of Distinguished Counsel

Super Lawyer
Criminal & DUI Defense

Top 100 Trial Lawyers
(Criminal Defense)

American Trial Lawyers Association

Client Satisfaction Award
American Institute of DUI / DWI Attorneys

Top 100 Lawyer
American Society of Legal Advocates

Top 10 DUI/DWI Law Firm
American Institute of DUI / DWI Attorneys

National College for DUI Defense

Top 10 Attorney
National Academy of Criminal Defense Attorneys

Charter Member
Trial Masters

DUI Defense Lawyers Association

Lifetime Charter Member
Best Attorneys of America

American Bar Foundation

Sustaining Member
Arizona Trial Lawyers Association

American Association for Justice

Life Member
Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice

Superior DUI Attorney
National Advocacy for DUI Defense

Member Since 1989
American Bar Association

Better Business Bureau
A+ Rating

Call 24/7 602-307-0808

40 N Central Ave, Ste 2300
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Click here for Directions

For Family Law questions please go to Cantor Law Group.
For Car Accident or Personal Injury Visit Cantor Injury Lawyers.
[contact-form-7 id="34943" title="Exit Intent"]