Disclaimer - Results depend upon factors unique to each case and that results in one case do not predict similar results in others.
DISMISSED – Production and Possession of Marijuana for Sale, State v. Mr. R.
DISMISSED – Production and Possession of Marijuana for Sale, State v. Mr. R. (DMC No. 9914) (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CR 2009-006670): Mr. R. had gotten into an argument with his girlfriend when the police were called. When they arrived, the girlfriend’s mother told the police that Mr. R had been growing Marijuana in the shed, and had been selling Marijuana along with some Methamphetamine. The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office waited almost 2 years to charge Mr. R., and in that time they had lost the video tape detailing the alleged crime scene. We then filed a Willets –a motion which would have greatly hurt the State’s case. The State was then forced to file a motion to dismiss all charges.
DISMISSED – Possession of Cocaine for Sale
DISMISSED – Possession of Cocaine for Sale, State v. R. (DMC No. 1501) (1997090066CR): Mr. R was on probation and his house was randomly searched by his probation officer, who found cocaine during the search. Mr. R. was facing a minimum of 10 years in prison if convicted. We were able to demonstrate problems with the search by his probation officer and got the charges dismissed.
DISMISSED – Possession & Sale of Ecstasy
DISMISSED – Possession & Sale of Ecstasy, State v. Mr. M. & State v. Mr. M. (DMC No.’s 2352/2355) (20001286CR): Mr. M. and Mr. M. stayed out of town while attending a “rave” concert. They were subsequently stopped and searched by police in order to see if they were selling ecstasy. While this occurred, one of the officers made racial slurs and slapped Mr. M. in the face. They were then both booked into jail. We contacted the Internal Affairs Department of the Eloy Police Department and had the officers involved disciplined. In addition, all charges were dismissed against Mr. M. and Mr. M.
DISMISSED – Transportation of Marijuana for Sale
DISMISSED – Transportation of Marijuana for Sale, State v. Mr. P. (DMC No. 3712) (2003032789CR): Mr. P. was accused of sending 8 pounds of marijuana through the U.S. Mail. We were able to demonstrate that the State would have a very difficult time proving it was Mr. P. who actually mailed the marijuana. In addition, there were no fingerprints or admissions tying him to this crime. We were able to negotiate a deal which included taking some classes in exchange for a dismissal of all charges.
DISMISSED – Conspiracy to Sell Dangerous Drugs
DISMISSED – Conspiracy to Sell Dangerous Drugs, State v. Mr. A. (A713869CR): Police stopped Mr. A. for a minor traffic violation and then searched his vehicle without permission. Over 200 pills of Ecstasy and cocaine were found in his vehicle. Due to the fact that the search was illegal, we were able to get the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office to dismiss the charges.
DISMISSED – Manufacturing and Possession of Dangerous Drugs for Sale
DISMISSED – Manufacturing and Possession of Dangerous Drugs for Sale, State v. Mr. L. (2002001427CR): Mr. L. was stopped by police, and they discovered materials in his vehicle which could be used in the manufacture of methamphetamine. Police then obtained a search warrant (after the fact) and Mr. L. was charged with numerous drug charges. We then filed a Motion to Suppress all Evidence based on a bad search, and the Maricopa County Attorney’ office subsequently dismissed all charges against Mr. L.
DISMISSED – Possession of Marijuana for Sale
DISMISSED – Possession of Marijuana for Sale, State v. Ms. N. (1999010346CR): Ms. N. lived in an apartment with her boyfriend and 2 other males. Her roommates were both involved in drug activity of which Ms. Nguyen had knowledge. However, she never participated in any of the sales or profits. Although she was charged with a very serious felony and the original plea offer from the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office was prison time, we were able to show that 1 of her co-defendants was the true drug dealer, and all charges were dismissed against Ms. N.
